Search for: "State v. T. L. D."
Results 101 - 120
of 4,146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
The alderman insists that he'd borrowed $110k. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
Fifth, there is a state action overlay when it comes to Big Tech censorship (see Missouri v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:27 pm
Harvard (D. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 10:52 am
The Act provides an eleven-factor list that the Attorney General or a court may use to determine if a website is indeed covered, which includes malleable and broad-ranging considerations like “[d]esign elements” and “[l]anguage. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
” How all this will play out remains to be seen, but the process won’t play out quickly; rather, it will, according to the Journal, be a “slow grind. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Westbrook, decided today by the Utah Court of Appeals (written by Judge Ryan D. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
In McCloskey v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 12:33 pm
From Richwine v. [read post]
24 Dec 2023, 3:26 pm
Goldsmith, Western District of Pennsylvania District Judge Stephanie L. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Judge Weinstein observed that when the hand waving stopped, “[t]here is no evidence that plaintiffs were exposed to the far higher concentrations involved in both animal and industrial exposure studies. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 2:31 pm
Not surprisingly, by the late 1980’s, several Members of Congress remained concerned that there still weren’t sufficient safeguards in place to protect the FEHBP program from health care fraud and abuse. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 11:11 am
" Int'l Paper Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 4:15 pm
United States, Dred Scott v. [read post]
15 Dec 2023, 12:17 pm
Rather than setting cases for re-argument, the Court 4-4'd cases including Friedrichs v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 2:38 pm
Supp. 1036 (D. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 8:49 am
Domo, Inc., 2019 WL 3555509 (D. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Bank National Association v Langner, 168 AD3d 1021 [2d Dept 2019])” The Court observed that CPLR § 2309 sets forth the way oaths and affirmations are to be administered and notes in section (c) regarding oaths and affirmations taken without the state: An oath or affirmation taken without the state shall be treated as if taken within the state if it is accompanied by such certificate or certificates as would be required to entitle a deed acknowledged… [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
On Dec. 7, one week before the fake electoral votes were cast, District Judge Linda V. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 6:00 pm
Shouldn't the UNCITRAL be working on this? [read post]
