Search for: "State v. Tate"
Results 101 - 120
of 403
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2022, 9:16 am
On Wednesday 23rd February, judgment will be handed down in Craig (AP) v Her Majesty’s Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another, on appeal from [2020] HCJAC 22. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 8:19 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 14/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 07/2/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard… [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 3:18 am
On Wednesday 2nd February, the UKSC will hand down judgment in R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited). [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:06 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Keenan, decided Feb. 5 by the Washington Commission on Judicial Conduct but just posted on Westlaw (some paragraph breaks and numbering deleted); the opinion is signed by members Ruth Reukauf, Robert Alsdorf, Ramon Alvarez, Wanda Briggs, Kristian Hedine, Rich Melnick, and Michael Tate: At all times pertinent hereto, Judge Keenan was a Superior Court Judge [in the civil department] for King County, Washington…. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:21 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:32 am
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC, heard 20 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) (Expedited), heard 23 and 24 June 2021 Basfar… [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
(…) In 1952, in what has been dubbed the “Tate Letter,” the State Department changed course and enunciated “a new, ‘restrictive’ theory of sovereign immunity. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:30 am
Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport Nadine Dorries announced a new pact on the use and exchange of data between the two nations. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:23 am
On Tuesday 7th and Wednesday 8th December the court will hear the case of Fearn and others v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Tate v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Tate v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 5:22 pm
As has been widely reported (CNN), the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals early today in United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 7:30 am
Explaining that it is "well-settled [s]tate policy that appointments and promotions within the civil service system must be merit-based and, when 'practicable,' determined by competitive examination," as mandated by Article V §6 of the State Constitution, opined that "[t]he constitutional dictate does not create an absolute bar to civil service appointments and promotions without competitive examinations. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 2:24 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Bad acts Convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Wicomico County of distribution of cocaine and related offenses, Donald Edward Tate, appellant, presents for our review two questions: whether the court “allow[ed] inadmissible hearsay into evidence,” and whether the court “allow[ed] inadmissible and prejudicial ‘other ... [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 5:52 pm
" Finding no basis to disturb Supreme Court's judgment, the Appellate Division dismissed Petitioner's appeal. * In 2011, the State of New York merged the Banking Department and the Insurance Department into the Respondent herein, the Department of Financial Services [See Chapter 62, §1 Part A of the Laws of 2011]. ** The Appellate Division cited Citing Cohen v New York State Civ. [read post]
