Search for: "State v. Tri-State Pharmaceutical" Results 101 - 120 of 454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  The plaintiff in Miller, therefore, tried to distinguish the case from those involving oral-dose formulations, which really just take issue with inherent risks associated with the API. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:24 am by Venkat
Finally, plaintiffs tried to rely on Rule 4(k), which provides personal jurisdiction based on federal claims where the defendant may not be subject to jurisdiction in a particular state, but has minimum contacts with the U.S. as a whole. [read post]
29 May 2014, 5:00 am
  That’s been tried before and failed − plaintiffs can’t avoid the statute by asserting claims against healthcare providers that purportedly sound in strict liability. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 6:20 am by Bexis
Oct. 16, 2012) (following Guenther in denying similar request.Subsequently, another pair of A/Z plaintiffs tried again in Bowles v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 7:03 am
  A collocation attack is often tried, but is rarely successful. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:01 am by Bexis
Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 06 Civ. 0260 (BMC) (RER), slip op. [read post]