Search for: "State v. Virtue"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,807
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
In Zambrano, which like Rottman (C-135/08, EU:C:2010:104) concerned a purely internal situation, the CJEU held that TFEU, art 20 precludes national measures which have the effect of depriving EU citizens of the genuine enjoyment of the substance of the rights conferred by virtue of their status as citizens of the Union. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 6:11 am
And there is, I suppose, a virtue in that. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:10 am
In Ansley v. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Facilitator: Akanmu Adebayo, Ombuds, Kennesaw State University Mediation v. ombuds. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 3:41 pm
One of these cases was U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:38 am
Woodson v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am
The Court of Appeal was bound by the decisions in Zalewska v Department for Social Development [2008] UKHL 67; [2008] 1 WLR 2602 and Kaczmarek v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2008] EWCA Civ 1310; [2009] PTSR 897. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:41 pm
In the judgment in the case Becker v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 10:47 am
In Patrick v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
Furthermore, by virtue of Article 54 of the ICSID Convention, the Award would fall to be enforced in the territories of signatories to the ICSID Convention (many of which are not EU Member States) as if they were judgments of the courts in that State (Up, paras. 256 – 257). [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Pastor v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 6:56 am
The suit (United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 2:55 pm
Here is the abstract:This Article discusses the case of Al-Marri v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
The latter court, however, concluded that sufficient state action was present by virtue of the admission of the confession into evidence in a court of the State. 702 P.2d, at 728–729.The difficulty with the approach of the Supreme Court of Colorado is that it fails to recognize the essential link between coercive activity of the State, on the one hand, and a resulting confession by a defendant, on the other. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:25 pm
The latter court, however, concluded that sufficient state action was present by virtue of the admission of the confession into evidence in a court of the State. 702 P.2d, at 728–729.The difficulty with the approach of the Supreme Court of Colorado is that it fails to recognize the essential link between coercive activity of the State, on the one hand, and a resulting confession by a defendant, on the other. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:53 am
However, I find it hard to square with his vote in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:00 am
In Nagy v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 7:00 am
State (1934). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:23 am
In ITC Ltd v. [read post]
