Search for: "State v. Whitford"
Results 101 - 120
of 215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 6:54 am
United States and Benisek v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 8:48 pm
United States; (2) Christie v. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 11:00 pm
Whitford, 585 U. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 10:08 am
Whitford, et al, 3:05cv823 (JCH). [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
At Just Security, William Dodge discusses last week’s oral argument in Jesner v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 10:54 am
Whitford. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm
Whitford. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 4:17 am
The first was Gill v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
Commentary on Jesner v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
United States, in which a defendant is asking the court to consider the dual-sovereignty exception to the double jeopardy clause of the Constitution that allows state and federal governments to prosecute an individual for the same action. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 11:32 am
Whitford last year was deeply pessimistic. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:14 am
Whitford, which found that Wisconsin partisan-gerrymandering plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the statewide legislative map. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm
Whitford is going to undermine public confidence in the Court. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:12 am
Whitford, asserting that“the idea that [the] efficiency gap flags neutral maps as often as partisan maps is just wrong, and it shouldn’t have been part of the state’s argument before the court. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
If a survey is justified and permission granted, a party could also do much worse than to ensure compliance with the "Whitford guidelines" set out in the seminal case Imperial Group plc & Another v. [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 11:25 am
In Lamone v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 11:12 am
Whitford emerges, but in other states that would be competitive but for gerrymandering. [read post]
