Search for: "State v. Wiggins"
Results 101 - 120
of 216
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
The plaintiff’s allegations of “intentional harm,” which the Supreme Court properly interpreted as stating a cause of action alleging prima facie tort, were unsupported by facts demonstrating that the defendants acted with “malicious intent or disinterested malevolence” in the prior action (Ahmed Elkoulily, M.D., P.C. v New York State Catholic Healthplan, Inc., 153 AD3d 768, 772; see Dorce v Gluck, 140 AD3d 1111,… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:19 am
" However, applying what it termed "a careful reading" of Wiggins v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 10:39 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 7:04 am
The Court denied relief in Strickland, but then in a couple of more recent cases (Wiggins v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
The Circuit Court said that while it did not generally have jurisdiction to review the decisions of the Merit Systems Protection Board, it did have jurisdiction over this type of “mixed case,” citing Wiggins v US Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:55 am
See U.S. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm
” COA denied on claims relating to “whether he is entitled to review on the merits of his punishment-phase ineffective assistance of counsel claim under Wiggins v. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am
Wiggins, 113 Ga. 149 (3) (1884); Bennett v. [read post]
4 Jan 2015, 12:05 pm
It can probably manage C:\dir > print.txt United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 3:05 pm
" See generally Wiggins v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 3:48 am
In Hotchkiss v. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:47 am
State 798 So.2d 829 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) versus Wiggins v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 11:44 am
Smith, Rompilla v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
Nor do we believe that our decision will lead to unpredictability or confusion given that it reiterates the proposition that bare legal conclusions in a pleading are not entitled to consideration when assessing a motion to dismiss under CPLR 3211 (a) (7) (see Myers v Schneiderman, 30 NY3d 1, 11 [2017]; Connaughton v Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., 29 NY3d at 141; Maas v Cornell Univ., 94 NY2d 87, 91 [1999]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126… [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:00 am
Garza 17-654 Issue: Whether, pursuant to United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:04 pm
The Supreme Court has voted to overturn the landmark 1973 Roe v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:25 am
His cases have ranged from the intricacies of intellectual property, such as his defense of music industry copyrights in 2005, to the complexities of the death penalty, such as his pro bono work in Wiggins v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am
After unsuccessfully appealing his conviction and pursuing state collateral review, Ayestas filed a federal habeas petition in 2009, raising a series of claims – including that, under Wiggins v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court apparently is considering whether to hear a case, Wisconsin v. [read post]
