Search for: "Steven Calabresi"
Results 101 - 120
of 410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2022, 10:49 am
Author David Garrow praised the opinion in the Wall Street Journal (prompting letters from Professor Steven Calabresi and Jennifer Mascott). [read post]
7 May 2022, 6:15 am
--Steven G. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
Guest Blogger This post was prepared for a roundtable on Reforming the Supreme Court of the United States, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Sherwin, Wallace Stevens Professor of Law, Director of the Visual Persuasion Project, New York Law School -- Law in the Shadow of Violence: The Riddle and the Paradox of Sovereignty W. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:55 am
"—Steven Gow Calabresi, Northwestern Pritzker School of Law "Is the President too powerful, or not powerful enough? [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
No one has more ably advanced the theory of the unitary executive than Steven Calabresi, so it comes as no surprise that his response to our book brackets Trump as an “oddball” and diminishes the structural problem his presidency exposed. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Steven G. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 6:00 am
Dearborn and, Desmond King: Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic: The Deep State and The Unitary Executive (Oxford University Press, 2021).We have assembled a terrific group of commentators, including Anya Bernstein (Buffalo), Steven Calabresi (Northwestern), Blake Emerson (UCLA), Stephen Griffin (Tulane), Paul Gowder (Northwestern), Victoria Nourse (Georgetown), Daphna Renan (Harvard), Cristina Rodriguez (Yale), and myself.At the conclusion, the authors will respond to the… [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
But, in fact, there is a compelling originalist rationale for subjecting sex-discriminatory laws to a high level of scrutiny, developed by prominent conservative originalist constitutional law scholar Steven Calabresi and his coauthor Julia Rickert. [read post]
24 May 2021, 6:41 am
Broyde begins his argument for indefinitely extended SCOTUS tenure by arguing at length that even an 18-year term limit, as proposed by scholars including my colleague Steven Calabresi, is a bad idea. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm
With Donald Trump having been evicted from the White House, and with the country now embarking on its second month under President Joe Biden’s leadership, some once-immediate issues of public concern have been pushed aside. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 6:06 am
Calabresi and Norman L. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Some things sadden us: Cries of election rigging started long before anything happened perhaps because Republicans had spent years very publicly trying to rig the election against Democrats by excluding or gerrymandering Democratic voters. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 12:43 pm
Numerous conservative and libertarian legal scholars and political commentators are also backing impeachment (I give examples here and here, and there are plenty of others, such as Ramesh Ponnuru, Henry Olsen, and Federalist Society co-founder Steven Calabresi). [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:32 am
” Law professor Steven G. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:26 am
In today's New York Times, Northwestern law professor Steven Calabresi, co-chairman of the Federalist Society, recounts his mutual admiration for the late Justice Ginsburg makes the case for imposing term limits on Supreme Court justices. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 4:33 am
Law prof Steven Calabresi has an op-ed in the New York Times, following on a law review article dated 2005 and published in 2006, proposing the switch from life tenured terms of office to 18-year terms, staggered every two years so that every president gets to pick a justice in his first and third year. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 6:24 pm
Calabresi has this essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Steven G. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 11:21 am
However, there is in fact a strong originalist case for applying heightened scrutiny to sex-discriminatory laws, developed by prominent conservative constitutional law scholar Steven Calabresi and Julia Rickert. [read post]
