Search for: "Stevens v. Brennan"
Results 101 - 120
of 318
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 pm
”Similarly, in his 2005 opinion for the Court in Kelo v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 2:00 pm
Booth was a 1987 5-4 decision, with Justices Powell, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun and Stevens in the majority, with dissenting votes from Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices White, O’Connor and Scalia. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 4:46 am
Coverage of Wednesday’s argument in Buck v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
The dissent was composed of the liberals on the Court: Harry Blackmun, William Brennan, and Thurgood Marshall. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
Yet as to results, if not always rationale, he sometimes seemed, as I joke with my students, to “channel Justice Brennan. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:17 am
Then there are cases like Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 10:24 am
Brennan, Jr. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:00 am
And in Green v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 6:10 am
More coverage of Monday’s ruling in Zubik v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
” Three dissents were filed in the case, by Justices Brennan, Blackmun, and Stevens. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 9:01 pm
Justice Scalia, dissenting (and joined by Justices Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens) disagreed. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm
Howard Fischer of Havasu News reviews Harris v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 10:07 am
Ohio, as explained in my brief in Utah v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:04 am
Jackson wrote in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
Coverage comes from Steven Mazie for The Economist. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 7:08 am
” As examples he cited Justices William Brennan, Earl Warren, John Paul Stevens, David Souter, and Harry Blackmun. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 2:48 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Green v. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 9:39 am
Powell v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 3:48 am
” And in The Economist, Steven Mazie concludes that the Justices “seemed divided about how to resolve” the case. [read post]
