Search for: "Stocking v. Ives"
Results 101 - 120
of 646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
For example, “[t]he general stock of incidents in fiction or drama is free for all to use ― a substantial part of everyone’s culture, not of any one individual’s work”: D. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:39 am
The 1966, Texas Supreme Court case styled, Williams v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 3:12 pm
So the headline of a WSJ article today is "SEC Didn't Expand Upon Stock-Abuse Settlement," and the first sentence reads: "The Securities and Exchange Commission has failed to turn key parts of a landmark stock-research settlement into industrywide rules, a move that threatens to gut pieces of the pact. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 7:45 am
Gould IV is the Charles A. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 1:09 pm
Consistent with Delaware Supreme Court precedent in Kahn v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 1:04 am
CIM Real Estate Finance Trust reportedly acquired the two REITs in separate stock-for-stock, tax-free merger transactions. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
If it changes the peer group in subsequent years, it must provide disclosure of the change in accordance with Regulation S-K Item 402(v)(2)(iv). [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 12:15 am
(2) No person resident in India shall at any time, directly or indirectly, either individually or together with persons acting in concert, acquire or hold more than five per cent. of the paid up equity share capital in a recognised stock exchange: Provided that,— (i) a stock exchange; (ii) a depository; (iii) a banking company; (iv) an insurance company; and (v) a public financial institution, may acquire or hold, either… [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm
Minnesota, Florida Star v BJF, and Bartnicki v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
Segmented order: An order for an NMS stock that is for an account: (1) of a natural person or an account held in legal form on behalf of a natural person or group of related family members; and (2) in which the average daily number of trades executed in NMS stocks was less than 40 in each of the six preceding calendar months. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 4:40 pm
Authorizes SEC tick size pilot program for emerging growth company stocks. [read post]
18 May 2021, 4:02 pm
[iv] Id. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 1:30 pm
IIROC ultimately made a number of recommendations to address the issues identified, including: (i) a review of the current market-wide circuit breaker to determine whether trigger levels are appropriate and whether an independent Canadian circuit breaker level should be employed; (ii) considering whether single stock circuit breakers should be implemented; (iii) the adoption of volatility controls; (iv) considering how to effectively manage stop loss… [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 2:29 pm
The one-page en banc Order of affirmance was entered in the matter of Swomley v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 7:23 pm
So long as there is a genuine divestment of the equity stake of the promoters in excess of the limit prescribed by Regulation 8, that would fulfill the requirement of Regulation 8;(iv) Stock exchanges are an integral part of the statutory framework which SEBI regulates in relation to the securities market. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:33 am
Part IV (read it here) addressed the court's September 2007 decision in which it denied defendants' motion for summary judgment contesting Marciano's share ownership and arguing that Marciano's March 2007 guilty plea to unrelated stock fraud charges justified their excluding him from the business operations.This Part V examines the court's final decision dated December 7, 2007, concerning a new twist in the proceedings triggered by the… [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 4:30 am
Part IV (read it here) addressed the court's September 2007 decision in which it denied defendants' motion for summary judgment contesting Marciano's share ownership and arguing that Marciano's March 2007 guilty plea to unrelated stock fraud charges justified their excluding him from the business operations.This Part V examines the court's final… [read post]
2 May 2017, 9:31 am
This includes considering reviewing practices with respect to: (i) the effectiveness of rules regarding the duties, responsibilities and composition of boards within group structures; (ii) the framework for related party transactions; (iii) shareholder votes on pay; (iv) the disclosure of beneficial ownership; and (v) the role and responsibilities of independent directors on the board and board committees. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
See Appellant’s Br., Norman v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 10:32 pm
Part IV explains why these proposals are also, under state law, illegal, unfair to current shareholders that do not vote in favor of them, and unenforceable as to future stock purchasers. [read post]
