Search for: "Strauss v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2011, 9:40 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York to 11 years in prison—the lengthiest term ever imposed on an individual for insider trading violations (United States v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 4:00 pm
Oregon v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:36 am
MOZIE section 2(d) opposition but nixes fraud claim (TTABlog) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Levi Strauss – Levi Strauss’s trademark and domain name claims may block unauthorized resales: Levi Strauss v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:08 am
Perhaps more importantly, the facts of the case signal to asylum applicants that one need not be beaten to the point of hospitalization or brutally raped to have suffered persecution; the real facts that led to flight may alone be enough to obtain protection in the United States. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:17 am
United States, holding that evidence obtained through a search that was legal when it was conducted will not be subject to the exclusionary rule. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:27 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:39 am
In Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 11:47 am
In the 1950s Leo Strauss had criticised the degree to which public debate in the United States had descended into what he described as “reductio ad Hitlerum“, whereby opponents of a policy would liken it to a fascist policy or label its proponents Nazis to score political points (regardless of the distinctions between the policy and those pursued by the Nazis). [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 11:23 pm
United States du 4 mars 1895 établit le principe de la présomption d’innocence pour les personnes accusés de crimes. [read post]
28 May 2011, 3:47 am
A curious note in initial coverage of the matter of NY v DSK was the claim that the United States and France have no extradition treaty.Could that be? [read post]
20 May 2011, 8:41 am
The perp walk of Dominique Strauss-Kahn has attracted much criticism in France and in parts of the United States. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:50 am
United Nations, 311 Fed.Appx. 407, 409 (2d Cir. 2009) (citing Donald v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:35 am
However, the United States is not a party to that treaty. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:52 am
NEW YORK—The May 11 guilty verdict in the insider-trading trial of former Galleon Management LLC principal Raj Rajaratnam may embolden federal prosecutors to use increasingly aggressive tactics during insider trading cases, former prosecutors told BNA May 11 (United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
” He looked to the seven-factor test in Strauss v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 5:14 pm
The intervention in the Samantar case by the State Department is particularly significant because the United States only occasionally intervenes in litigation, and very rarely intervenes to claim that a defendant is not entitled to immunity. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
(Seattle Trademark Lawyer) 9th Circuit changes dilution standard: Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:01 pm
Last week’s Levi Strauss v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
Levi Strauss registered the Arcuate design with the United States Patent and Trademark Office in 1943. [read post]
