Search for: "Stuart v. State District Judge"
Results 101 - 120
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm
He therefore allowed an application by the Guardian for access to documents which were placed before the District Judge and referred to in the course of the extradition hearings. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm
On INFORRM we had a case comment by Stuart Gibson. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
United States, 11-7650, Bagu v. [read post]
D.C. Circuit Review – Reviewed: It’s Not Rocket Science, But It’s Still a Matter of Agency Expertise
27 Mar 2022, 7:33 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
After an unsuccessful direct appeal, United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 10:17 am
See also State v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm
As forecast ad nauseum in recent weeks, the Court summarily reversed in one of the long-running trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Hardy v. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 9:51 pm
How knowledgeable are the district judges and deputy district judges who sit in these courts? [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:01 am
Currently, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is considering Judge McMahon’s dismissal of Southern Cherry Street LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am
United States, 10-7387, which involves whether a district court can direct that a federal sentence be served consecutively to a state sentence that had not yet been imposed. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
An Iowa judge agreed. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 3:09 pm
Mo. 2009); Healy/Mellon-Stuart Co. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
” Judge J. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
United States and Barber v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
12 May 2024, 11:54 am
Last year, the state court ruled in favor of the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
10 Apr 2020, 2:43 pm
" As we stated in our opinion, those "controlling" standards come from the Supreme Court's decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
