Search for: "Stucki " Results 101 - 120 of 257
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2011, 7:42 am by Viking
  Erdmann wrote for himself and Effron and Stucky, with Baker writing in dissent for himself and Ryan. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:06 pm by Mike "No Man" Navarre
  Erdmann, Effron, and Stucky in the majority and Baker and Ryan in dissent. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 1:13 pm by Patti Spencer
Claire Zillman writes for The AmLaw Daily: "The Keatings complaint alleges that Joffe suggested Notz Stucki & Cie as one of two managers for a trust established in 2008. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Judge Ryan wrote for the majority, joined by Judges Erdmann and Stucky. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm by Marcus Fulton
  Judge Stucky, joined by Judges Erdmann and Ryan, acknowledged at the outset that longstanding precedent permitted omission of the terminal element from Article 134 specifications, and that the sample specifications in the Manual typically do not contain the terminal element. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 2:33 pm by Dwight Sullivan
” Judge Stucky wrote for the majority, joined by Judges Erdmann and Ryan. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  A majority consisting of Judges Erdmann, Stucky, and Ryan have consistently barred the appellant from pursuing an appeal or petition for extraordinary relief in such cases. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:32 am by Zachary Spilman
Judge Stucky’s Dissent In a dissenting opinion joined by Judge Ryan, Judge Stucky objects to the majority’s reasoning based on (1) a more deferential standard of review of the decision of the CCA, (2) a determination that the court of appeals can itself decide meaningfulness of relief (finding that Zarbatany received meaningful relief, under the circumstances of this case, by serving no post-trial confinement and making no forfeitures), and (3) objection to the… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:55 pm by Viking
Judge Baker writes for the majority, joined by Ryan and Stucky. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 2:15 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Judge Stucky wrote for the majority. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:22 pm by Michelle Lindo McCluer
Judge Stucky wrote for the majority, and Judge Ryan wrote a dissent for herself and Judge Erdmann in US v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:58 pm
Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 (Fed. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Judge Baker, who wrote for the majority, was joined by Judges Stucky and Ryan. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 3:05 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Judge Ryan wrote a dissent, which Judge Stucky joined. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 4:17 am by Zachary Spilman
Moreover, in his dissenting opinion, Judge Stucky, joined by Judge Baker, feels that the government should not be barred from raising the issue of error at CAAF without taking a cross-appeal. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:05 am by Danielle Citron
After law school, he worked at Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, clerked for Judge Scott Stucky on the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces and then joined Winston & Strawn LLP to help build the firm’s appellate practice in New York. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:30 am by Viking
              Case Effron Baker Stucky Ryan Erdmann Alston W J J J J AR Savard J J W J J AF Staton SC W J J J AF White J J J J W AF Blazier J J J W J AF Stefan J J W J J AR Hutchins J J J W J MC Jones D J J W J NA Soto J J J W J AR Luke WD J C WC W NA Pope J J WC W J … [read post]
19 May 2011, 9:26 am by Michelle Lindo McCluer
” Holding that the court members could have decided the complainant had made a previous false rape accusation that would have significantly damaged her credibility regarding the rape claim at issue in the court-martial, the Court reversed the findings.Judges Stucky and Baker dissented, rejecting the majority’s “law-of-the-case” analysis and finding no prejudice from the military judge’s erroneous evidentiary ruling. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:36 pm by Dwight Sullivan
  Judges Stucky and Baker dissented. [read post]