Search for: "Sullivan v. Department of Corrections"
Results 101 - 120
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2015, 6:55 am
After the Times’s Public Editor Margaret Sullivan voiced support for Risen’s polemic, Jack and Ben noted that, while they agree with Sullivan’s assertion that the Times should support “truth-telling and challenging the powerful,” Risen’s rant doesn’t deserve such lofty honorifics. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 3:36 am
See, e.g., Sullivan-Mestecky v. [read post]
2 Dec 2007, 7:20 am
Coordinators have assisted over 300 families this year, and have a presence with Title V, P & A, CHIP, the Child Find Policy and Practice Committee, the Governor's Chronic Illness Task Force and the Family Resource Connection (devoted to early childhood issues)! [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
On 19 May 2017, in the case of Dreyer v O’Sullivan, a psychiatrist was granted a without notice harassment injunction against an ex-patient who has been harassing him. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am
Sullivan v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
More recently, the Clinton administration's Sandy Vershbow and Nelson Drew help to create the path leading to the Dayton Accords; Meghan O’Sullivan advocates for the Iraq surge in the George W. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm
Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 12:30 pm
Sullivan is "a threat to American Democracy. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:48 pm
Sullivan is involved in any number of high-profile cases, including the matter of Hillary Clinton’s State Department e-mails, so worlds are colliding. [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Sullivan. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 3:12 pm
In Samuels v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
Sullivan, which holds that public figures cannot recover for defamation consistent with the First Amendment unless they demonstrate the press acted recklessly or knowing their statements were false. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
Law Offices of Curtis V. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 10:45 pm
See Sullivan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am
Rather than answering the reported questions, we focus strictly on the correctness of the orders issued by the second judge in this case. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
Sullivan was on brief, for appellee Federal Transit Administration. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Thus, we should all be happy if the President is correct when he assured us that there is “not even a smidgen of corruption” regarding Lois G. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
But that’s true of many of these rules—context might lead to implicit exceptions v. reading the rules strictly.1:50 – 2:35 pm: Content Moderation and Law EnforcementClara Tsao, Chief Technology Officer, Interagency Countering Violent Extremism Task Force, Department of Homeland SecurityJacob Rogers, Wikimedia Foundation: works w/LE requests received by Foundation. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:54 am
Even if the District Court were correct to assume that the State Action Doctrine is relevant here, it was wrong to determine that the Authority is not a state actor. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Sullivan v. [read post]
