Search for: "Supreme Court U.S.A." Results 101 - 120 of 662
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2021, 8:38 am by Eugene Volokh
But, as we have stated, the district court found these facts to be genuinely disputed, and we must assume due to the posture of this appeal that [Oliver's mother] did submit a valid [statutory] request and that Arnold gave the Pledge assignment "for the purposes of teaching, fostering[,] and perpetuating the ideals, principles[,] and spirit of Americanism"—the intent the Supreme Court found impermissible in Barnette. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
Both cases address whether the regulations at issue warrant deference under Chevron U.S.A. v. [read post]
On prescription, the First Circuit applied a straight-forward reading of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling in Marin v. [read post]
On prescription, the First Circuit applied a straight-forward reading of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling in Marin v. [read post]
On prescription, the First Circuit applied a straight-forward reading of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling in Marin v. [read post]
On prescription, the First Circuit applied a straight-forward reading of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling in Marin v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 9:10 pm by Adam Garnick
Supreme Court decision in Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
26 May 2021, 9:10 pm by Adam Garnick
Supreme Court decision in Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
2 May 2021, 1:41 pm by Magdaleen Jooste
Supreme Court heard oral arguments on 21 April 2021 in the pending assignor estoppel case of Minerva Surgical Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2021, 6:00 am by Jody Simon
” This was the same argument pursued by the public interest parties at the Supreme Court. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 10:46 am by Maryellen Fullerton
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and about whether the government had changed its position since the Supreme Court decided to take up the case. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 10:14 am by Maryellen Fullerton
The textual intricacies and dense cross-references in the statutes give the Supreme Court room to embrace either side’s perspective. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:52 am by Paul M. Hauge
Contrary to Dorrell’s contention, the trial court had not required her to show fault on the part of Woodruff; instead, it had properly applied the requirement imposed by the Supreme Court in NJDEP v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:52 am by Paul M. Hauge
Contrary to Dorrell’s contention, the trial court had not required her to show fault on the part of Woodruff; instead, it had properly applied the requirement imposed by the Supreme Court in NJDEP v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:52 am by Paul M. Hauge
Contrary to Dorrell’s contention, the trial court had not required her to show fault on the part of Woodruff; instead, it had properly applied the requirement imposed by the Supreme Court in NJDEP v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:51 am by Bona Law PC
Yet five years after the North Carolina dental board lost at the Supreme Court, new disruptive competitors are still battling it out against dental boards across the country. [read post]