Search for: "T D C Energy Corp" Results 101 - 120 of 205
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am by Abbott & Kindermann
This update discusses selected litigation, regulations / administrative guidance and pending legislation, on both the federal and state levels, in the following general areas of environmental law: (A) Water Supply, (B) Water Quality, (C) Wetlands, (D) Air Quality, (E) Endangered Species, (F) NEPA, (G) Mining / Oil & Gas, and (H) Cultural Resources.A. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
We note, however, that DHHS’ recommendation explained that “[t]he opportunity for scientists to conduct clinical research with marijuana exists under the [D]HHS policy supporting clinical research with botanical marijuana. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
We note, however, that DHHS’ recommendation explained that “[t]he opportunity for scientists to conduct clinical research with marijuana exists under the [D]HHS policy supporting clinical research with botanical marijuana. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 4:04 pm by admin
National Energy Corp., where the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that National Energy had contravened the Trade-Marks Act (subsections 7(a), 22 and 53.2) and  criminal misleading advertising provision of the Competition Act (section 52) in comparative advertising to its competitor Direct Energy. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 5:21 am by mstein03
  These new claims generally consisted of a method of four steps: (a) crosslinking an ultra high molecular weight polyethylene block having a molecular weight not less than 5 million by irradiating the block with a high energy radiation at a level of at least 1 MR; (b) heating said crosslinked block up to a compression deformable temperature below the melting point of the UHMWPE; (c) subjecting said heated block to pressure; and then (d) cooling said block. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:52 am
Binnie J delivering the judgment of the Supreme Court of Canada added in Whirlpool Corp v Camco Inc [2001] FSR 46 at [49(c)] that "a 'mind willing to understand' necessarily pays close attention to the purpose and intent of the author. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
   The Court noted that the Seventh Circuit, in Cunningham Charter Corp. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:01 am by Steve Lombardi
"[Laughter]c No human being could fail to be deeply moved by such a [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 10:54 am by Keith Rizzardi
Army Corps over post-Katrina tree ban on levees bit.ly/zSKqkn Why the ESA? [read post]