Search for: "T. A. P. v. State of Alabama"
Results 101 - 120
of 276
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jan 2012, 2:39 am
Rules are rules, Nino says, and the state can't function without rules. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Lederle Laboratories, 656 P.2d 293, 297 (Or. 1982). [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
That last category is the really hard one, since we have to look at cases we don’t normally follow. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Alabama getaway indeed. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:20 am
Karlin v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:32 pm
From today's opinion in Moore v. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:38 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
State, Baldwin v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:32 am
Here again the fact that the aggrieved parties could receive a favorable decision from a higher Alabama body than the Board (from the state Supreme Court) did not warrant a refusal by the lower court to adjudicate the case. 411 U.S. at 580. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 11:46 am
P. 26(b)(1) Relevance is the touchstone. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
Deck and State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Here's our list, broken into categories:Jurisdictions In Which the Legislature or Highest Court Has Adopted the Rule in Prescription Medical Product Cases (32):Alabama: Walls v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
Brief of the United States as Amicus Curiae, New York v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co., 973 P.2d 527, 542 (Cal. 1999)), which don’t follow anybody else’s pattern. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:18 pm
See p. 13.The underlying question is whether a defendant with a mental claim is entitled to an appointed, state-paid expert who is a partisan member of the defense team or whether a court's appointment of a neutral expert to examine the defendant and report to both sides meets the requirement of the high court's 1985 precedent in Ake v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
Pix credit here In a 53 page opinion, the United States District Court for Northern Alabama has ruled, in National Small Business Association v. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., 342 P.3d 847 (Ariz. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 9:24 pm
The facts of Murphy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” Gompers v United States, 233 U.S. 604, 610 (1914). [read post]
