Search for: "T. B.1."
Results 101 - 120
of 29,940
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Dec 2012, 3:01 pm
If, as argued by [the opponent], the skilled person would take into consideration the entire disclosure of document A2 and in particular seriously contemplate the broader glass composition disclosed at page 9, lines 20 to 29 – i.e. the glass composition B – reproduced hereinafter: SiO2: 55 to 65%; preferably 58 to 62% Al2O3: 0 to 3%; preferably 1 to 2.5% CaO: 6 to 10%; preferably 7 to 9% MgO: 0 to 5%; preferably 1 to 4.5% Na2O: 15 to 22%; preferably 16 to 20%… [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
”R 99(2) provides that “In the statement of grounds of appeal the appellants shall indicate the reasons for setting aside the decision impugned, or the extent to which it is to be amended and the facts and evidence on which the appeal is based”.R 101(1) provides that “If the appeal does not comply with A 106 to A 108, R 97 or R 99, paragraph 1(b) or (c) or paragraph 2, the Board of Appeal shall reject it as inadmissible”.[2.1.2] As… [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Judges can’t sell Girl Scout cookies. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:00 am
On 7 December, the Board of Appeal posted a communication on their website wherein the decision in case T 1063/18 on the patentability of plants was summarized (see here). [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 11:08 am
Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b) states the following: (b) During an Inquiry into the Validity of a Verdict or Indictment. (1) Prohibited Testimony or Other Evidence. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Specifically, under the PCT this is a formal deficiency under Article 14(1)(a)(v) in combination with Rule 11.13(a), which can be remedied upon invitation under Article 14(1)(b). [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm
Claim 1 of this request read:1. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 1:52 am
For example, the surfactants in point (d) had been arbitrarily added to claim 1 from among a plurality of optional components which could have been selected instead, and the specific chemical composition of the anionic and nonionic surfactants had been used to amend points (b) and (c) of claim 1 from among multiple aspects which could have been used (e.g. the branching degree) to further restrict the scope of these surfactants. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Equal Employment Opportunity commission (EEOC).Angela Watson was dispatched by her union to work on a project for Diamond B as a pipefitter. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
Note that the Board also does not mention T 1989/18 of 16.12.2021 that concluded that, as a general rule, not is not required to bring the description in line with (amended) claims intended for grant.Summary of Facts and SubmissionsI. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
Other possible irregularities do not preclude rectification of the decision, since an applicant should have the right of examination in two instances (for example T 139/87, T 47/90, T 794/95).[4] Claim 1 of the request which formed the basis for the impugned decision has been amended such that present claim 1 is now directed to a system for humidifying gas for infusion into a patient eye comprising a gas source, as defined in former claim 5. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
As a result, the previous agreement of the appellant with that earlier text was conclusively withdrawn.The fact that the ED did not agree to the last amendment of claim 1 of the main request as filed with the appellant’s letter of 23 November 2011 but held it to be inadmissible for various procedural and substantive reasons (as set out both in its communication of 25/30 November 2011 and in the addendum to the decision under appeal) could not and did not “revive” or… [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 11:44 pm
Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi 3. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:40 am
This disclosure commends the wisdom of the change in the exception to confidentiality in Rule 1.6(b)(1). [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In this examination appeal case Board 3.3.04 had to deal with a request for correction.Claim 1 of the application as filed read:1. [read post]
5 May 2023, 12:00 am
Martin Nettesheim (University of Tübingen Law School) has posted Data Protection in Contractual Relationships (Art. 6 (1) (b) GDPR) on SSRN. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 11:08 pm
(b) The first auxiliary request contained an additional independent claim which contravened Rule 80 EPC. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 5:46 am
Hmm, that's tough to decipher. 2(b)(3) seems pretty specific, but what about 2(b)(1)? [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 10:35 am
§ 1591(a) and (b)(1). [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:25 pm
IRC § 170(b)(1)(E). [read post]
