Search for: "T. Doe"
Results 101 - 120
of 239,243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2018, 4:00 am
I consequently feel obliged to try and answer the question I didn’t then: does civility matter? [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
G 2/08 [5.10.7] also refers to “well-established case law” which includes decisions T 19/86, T 893/90 and T 233/96, all of which pertain to a novel group of subjects treated and were relied on by the appellant-opponent. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:59 am
We haven't seen any empirical scholarhip on this point (though, Lord knows, it might exist, and we simply haven't come across it). [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm
His point is that Doe’s situation isn’t unprecedented. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Thereby, said statement gave detailed reasons why the decision under appeal should be set aside and indicated the facts and evidence in support of the respective arguments.R 99(2) does not exclude that such evidence is submitted for the first time in appeal proceedings nor does it require that this evidence is admitted into the proceedings (see T 389/95 [1,3]).Therefore, the fact that the [opponent] relied inter alia on documents D6 to D13 in its statement setting out the… [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:01 pm
Similarly, it cites T 39/82, T 142/84, T 332/90, T 485/91 and T 25/97 for supporting that a new application of a known measure cannot lead to an inventive step if the problem does not change.The above cannot lead to the Board to exceptionally admit the evidence relating to the alleged public prior use of its own motion in the appeal proceedings.In assessing whether it qualifies as closest prior art, also the function of the guide has to be taken… [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am
The Board does, unfortunately, not discuss other case law that does give (or at least seems to give) a meaning to the term "closest", e.g., by using terminology such as "most promising" springboard (see e.g. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:18 pm
Repealing a dormant law shouldn't be this hard. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 2:17 pm
Savior of the species over here can't take any constructive criticism. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 9:05 pm
In his 9/11 memorial speech, which I thought was generally well done, President Obama proclaimed that "America does not give in to fear. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 9:22 am
Phone records reveal that Doe called him on the eve of this big drug transaction, and Doe testified that he was working on the sale to help the FBI, yet the agent “didn’t remember” the phone conversation at trial. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 9:16 am
Not only does the United States as a whole have statutes up the wazoo (technical lawyer term), but every individual state does as well. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 10:01 pm
But still, what isn’t here impresses me a lot more than what is. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:29 am
Here, John Doe's argument didn't fall into these exceptions so the Court could not (and did not) quash the subpoena.Motion to quash subpoena, denied.Malibu Media, LLC v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:05 am
Others are titles of books, or emblazoned in an ornamental manner on t-shirts or artwork. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 3:37 am
Sometimes it does provide an angle for us to hook into for a defense or at least discover additional information that maybe the officer didn’t mention when we talk to him. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
Hence, the board concludes that the requirements of R 99(1)(a) are met and thereby follows the jurisprudence established in decisions T 920/97 [1], T 475/07 [1.1] and T 1519/08 [2.1]). [2.2.3] Moreover, the board does not agree that the appeal proceedings should be stayed in view of decision T 445/08, pending as referral G 1/12. [read post]
27 May 2015, 10:20 am
If you don't have Lexis or one of its competitors, the same can be done with Google Scholar case law.Today the Ninth Circuit denied rehearing en banc and reiterated its reasons for the "John Doe. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 11:20 am
As an immigration law firm, Fong & Chun in Los Angeles receives questions about "what does immigration know about me" or "what does the computer at the airport show. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
According to D68, these proceedings have been pending until 25 October 2013, ie until after the oral proceedings before the present board and until after the decision announced therein.An action taken against the property of an opponent, here une procédure de Liquidation Judiciare [re-sic] Normale under French law against DF3 SAS, does not take away the opponent’s party status (T 696/02 [7.2]) and does not entail an interruption of the proceedings, R 142… [read post]
