Search for: "THOMAS CALLAHAN"
Results 101 - 120
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Robert Callahan 21. [read post]
15 May 2020, 10:11 am
Callahan, the Supreme Court ruled that lower courts can make a finding on part two of the test without addressing part one. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 12:13 pm
Will Thomas is the Judge. [read post]
7 May 2007, 7:34 am
Thomas, Graber, Gould, Berzon, and Smith)) rules that under 1324(a)(2):We hold that although all of the elements of the "bringing to" offense are satisfied once the aliens cross the border, the crime does not terminate until the initial transporter who brings the aliens to the United States ceases to transport them -- in other words, the offense continues until the initial transporter drops off the aliens on the U.S. side of the border. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:54 pm
Second, on a cultural level, there is a gradual melding of surveillance programs with a) what Daniel Callahan calls the “research imperative” and b) the rhetoric of war. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 10:38 am
Rawlinson (eligible on 12/16/2017) Judge Sidney Thomas (eligible on 8/14/2018) Three W. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 1:46 pm
Callahan, a desire to ease that burden. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 6:46 am
There is a concurrence by Gould (joined by O'Scannlain, Rymer, Silverman , Callahan, and Ikuta) that agrees with the result, but finds the majority (Berzon joined by Schroeder, Pregerson, Thomas, and Bea) unduly complicated, and dealing with facts that are not established (the dreaded hypotheticals) when it comes to duties of stand-by counsel. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:37 pm
Even advocates of pervasive surveillance recognize these difficulties.The increasing pressure to monitor what happens inside hospitals reminds me of a recent article by Thomas Goetz in Wired (no link yet) on Google co-founder Sergey Brin's quest to find a cure for Parkinson's disease. [read post]
13 May 2007, 12:31 pm
The decision is also interesting for its discussion of Section 1324 and how the subsections of this statute interrelate.Finally, the en banc case is a revealing snapshot of Circuit fault lines: Chief Judge Schroeder, Judges Reinhardt, Pregerson, Kozinski, Hawkins, Thomas, Graber, Gould, Berzon and Smith prevailed, Judge Bea "specially" concurred, and Judges Tallman, Rawlinson, Clifton and Callahan (forcefully) dissented.How to Use: An easily-overlooked (though important)… [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 11:07 pm
" Id. at *5.Of Note: In an unusual twist, Judge Gould "concurs" (though effectively, dissents) from his own per curiam decision - as do Judges Tallman and Callahan. [read post]
11 Jun 2016, 10:19 am
Judge Thomas dissented. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:39 pm
Thomas, 2014 U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 9:16 am
Callahan (2009), the Supreme Court altered the way in which courts apply the doctrine in a manner that created a significant obstacle for civil rights plaintiffs. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
Justice Thomas wrote for the majority. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 3:54 am
Thomas. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am
Thamer, Callahan, Calif. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:24 am
., and Thomas, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment). [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 4:32 am
Michael Callahan reports for CNN. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 12:56 pm
Gilbert, No. 11-35114 (en banc) (Kozinski with Thomas, Reinhardt, Wardlaw, Paez, and Nguyen; dissent by Tallman, joined by Rawlinson, Bybee, Callahan, and M. [read post]
