Search for: "THOMAS v. VIRGINIA" Results 101 - 120 of 1,375
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2023, 1:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Perhaps talk of the "Thomas Court" was premature. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm by Josh Blackman
The facts are fairly straightforward: Norfolk Southern Railways is headquartered in Virginia; the plaintiff is a citizen of Virginia; the plaintiff allegedly suffered injuries as an employee of the railroad in Virginia and Ohio. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 5:28 am by Guest Author
In other words, it was a straightforward application of the “new” MQD that was inaugurated last year in West Virginia v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 3:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
Around the same time, Thomas Jefferson used the Virginia provision as a model for expressing these same ideas in the Declaration of Independence. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 12:48 am by Joseph Fishkin
At oral argument, Justice Thomas picked up the baton (see oral argument transcript, 37–42). [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm by Amy Howe
” Alito, joined by Thomas, also penned a statement regarding the denial of review in Thompson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
The majority effectively, though not explicitly, overruled its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:33 pm by Amy Howe
The plaintiff in the case was Robert Mallory, a Virginia man who worked for Norfolk Southern, a Virginia-based railroad, in Virginia and Ohio. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
Texas joins California, Colorado, Connecticut, Montana, Virginia, and Utah (all in effect or going into effect in 2023), Montana and Tennessee (which, like Texas, go into effect in 2024), Iowa (effective 2025) and Indiana (effective 2026). [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
After Congress halted tribal treaty-making in 1871, the Court 's 1886 U.S. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Albert W. Alschuler
In 2008, the Court revived the long moribund Second Amendment, holding by a vote of 5-to-4 in District of Columbia v. [read post]