Search for: "Taylor v. Board of Education"
Results 101 - 120
of 240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of… [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 12:05 pm
" See Matter of Board of Educ. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
"]October 16, 2008 - 2 PM: Roche Diagnostics GmbH v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:48 am
When the employer took disciplinary action against employees, it could not avoid challenges under Section 75, even though none of the employees involved had used the grievance procedure past the second step.Nicholas Mancuso sued the New York City Board of Education on behalf of 20 School Safety Officers whom the board had suspended without pay, or terminated, for such misconduct as a drug-related arrest, sexual misconduct or excessive absenteeism. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
Her second complaint: her 1998 was evaluation by the board was unlawful because it constituted disciplinary action within the meaning of Section 3020-a of the Education Law and she was not served with charges or given a hearing.According to the ruling, Jefferson’s superintendent, Dr. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Although not identified as an issue in the Richfield Springs case, as the Appellate Division, Second Department noted in Port Washington USFD v Port Washington Teachers Association, 268 AD2d 523, [motion for leave to appeal denied, 95 NY2d 761], a statute, decisional law or public policy may preclude referring a Taylor Law contract dispute to arbitration.In Port Washington, the parties agreed to include a specific religious holiday provision in a Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 9:59 am
Board of Education could be defended, not in terms of its result, which he thought obviously correct, but its reasoning. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
" This view was amplified by the Court of Appeals in a subsequent ruling, Watertown Education Association, 93 NY2d 132. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
The decision by the Court of Appeals in Professional, Clerical, Technical Employees Association v Buffalo Board of Education [2 Rulings, #64 and #65], 90 N.Y.2d 364, provides some important insights as to the application of this concept. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:29 pm
Last week, in Bell v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
Compare Taylor v. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
The decision by the Court of Appeals in Professional, Clerical, Technical Employees Association v Buffalo Board of Education [2 Rulings, #64 and #65], 90 N.Y.2d 364, provides some important insights as to the application of this concept.The Association case arose when the Buffalo City School District "passed over" Melvin Cross, the highest-scoring candidate on a promotion examination eligible list for Associate Account Clerk and appointed three lower ranking… [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 3:29 am
The Vestal Employees Association filed an improper practice charge with the Public Employment Relations Board [PERB]. [read post]
28 Aug 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 12:35 pm
Williams in the opinion issued July 27 in Gammett v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 4:05 am
Board of Education of Township High School District 205, 391 U.S. 563 (1968), as refined in Garcetti v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 4:37 pm
”**NYPPL Comment: In any event, it should be noted that any “Memorandum of Understanding” such as the one referred to in McCart’s appeal must otherwise be consistent with law.As noted in PELP’s Layoff Guidebook [see below], the Education Law provides that in the event a board of education abolishes a position, the services of the tenured teacher having the least seniority in the school district or BOCES “within the tenure area of the… [read post]
