Search for: "Taylor v. Commissioner" Results 101 - 120 of 348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Monday 24 and Tuesday 25 June, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R v Reeves Taylor. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Tower MCashback LLP 1 and another, heard 21 -22 February 2011. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
" The Appellate Division ruled that under the controlling collective bargaining agreement "the Commissioner of Personnel is given sole discretion in granting paid leave. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
The district argued that PERB had exclusive jurisdiction over such issues.The Commissioner ruled that his disposition of the appeal considered matters unrelated to the Taylor Law and thus his dismissal of Fusco’s appeal and deferral to PERB was not required.In addition, the district asked the Commissioner for permission to submit two additional documents it claimed addressed substantive issues related to Fusco’s conduct after it had filed its answer to… [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 11:05 am by Steve Kalar
Sentencing Commissioner and District Judge Charles Breyer  In NorCal, District Judge (and Sentencing Commissioner) Charles Breyer is (correctly) reading this “illegal sentence” exception into every plea agreement. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:56 am
Weed claimed he was entitled to such leave under the terms of “Article 20” of the then controlling Taylor Law agreement. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 10:04 am by Joe Koncelik
In Taylor’s case, he had already made most of the improvements by the time the tax commissioner made his assessment of the change in the land’s value. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
Food and Drug Administration’s deputy commissioner for foods and veterinary medicine. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 5:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Based on the foregoing, Lindenwood’s factual allegations fail to support the element of proximate cause (see Levine v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, 256 AD2d at 149-150; Gersh v Nixon Peabody LLP, 2017 NY Slip Op 30363[U], 2017 NY Misc LEXIS 682, * 18-19 [Sup Ct, NY County 2017]; Caso v Sklarin, 2016 NY Misc LEXIS 6863, * 12-13 [Sup Ct, NY County May 26, 2016, No. 159192/2015]). [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Project Blue Ltd v Commissioners for HMRC, heard 28 Feb-1 Mar 2018. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 12:35 pm by Hadley Baker, Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the Northern District of California’s order granting a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 5:30 am by Joy
Debates Whether a Veggie Burger Is Really a BurgerMatthews v Ocean Nutrition: Departed employee awarded $1M bonus from company’s sale during notice periodTrudeau government pressed to shield secret operational information in court- Garry J. [read post]