Search for: "Taylor v. I. N. S" Results 101 - 120 of 390
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2020, 9:06 pm by Scott McKeown
In the decision, the Board explains that satisfying one of the Taylor v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm by Ben Berwick, Justin Florence
But the Journal conveniently neglects to include the rest of Blackstone’s commentary on “bribery,” which a mere five sentences later states that, “[i]n England this offense of taking bribes is punished, in inferior officers, with fine and imprisonment; and in those who offer a bribe, though not taken, the same” (emphasis added). [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
I felt like I poisoned my own child and everyone else that ate at my house. [read post]
6 Jul 2019, 10:43 am by Steve Kalar
The BIA, however, revisited the issue in a published decision, Matter of Cortes Medina, 26 I & N. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:05 pm by Rory Little
First, wrote Kavanaugh, “[i]n ordinary usage, ‘remaining in’ refers to a continuous activity” — the Supreme Court “has followed that ordinary meaning in analogous legal contexts. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]