Search for: "Taylor v. Ives" Results 101 - 120 of 128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm by cdw
In favor of the convicted or condemned Jarrod Taylor v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 3:48 am
Exhausting the contract grievance procedure is not always a condition precident to challenging a disciplinary actionMancuso v Crew, NYS Supreme Court, [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports]If a collective bargaining agreement contains a “contract grievance procedure,” must an employee who has been disciplined exhaust the contract grievance procedure before he or she may challenge the disciplinary action pursuant to Section 75 of the Civil Service Law? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:43 am by Steve Hall
Supreme Court in 1976 to reinstate the death penalty in Gregg v. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 4:22 pm by NL
Following Central Bedfordshire Council v Taylor [2010] 1 WLR 446 and Barber v Croydon LBC[2010] EWCA Civ 51 (and contra Doran v Liverpool CC [2009] 1 WLR 2365), at issue is a series of decisions, from deciding to serve notice through to enforcement of a warrant. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
Today I am testifying at an FCC hearing on “Serving the Public Interest in the Digital Era. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 4:55 am by Sam E. Antar
During the Company's two most recent fiscal years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 and through March 23, 2009, neither the Company nor anyone on its behalf consulted Grant Thornton LLP regarding either (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and no written report or oral advice was provided to the Company that Grant Thornton LLP concluded… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:00 pm
Now this is all very well, but what about cases like Taylors Fashions [1982] QB 133 (option to purchase extension to lease, unprotected Class C(iv) land charge, bound purchaser through estoppel – that’s off the top of my head, but I think it’s right) and, indeed, yaxley itself – would they survive section 2? [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
(Nearly) every majority opinion features a short introduction before it jumps into the standard I, II, III, IV, etc structure. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
I thought it might be helpful to bring a bit of rationality to the "raw milk debate. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
: (GenericsWeb), Europe: New EBA referral T 1319/04 regarding patentability of known medicament for new treatment of same illness: (IPKat), Europe: Patentability of biotechnology in Europe: (IAM), Europe: New EPO Enlarged Board case referrals: T1319/04 Dosage Regimen, T1242/06 Essential Biological Process: (Hal Wegner), Thailand: Compulsory licensing: Affordable health for Thailand thanks to Matrix Labs: (Spicy IP), Thailand: European Parliament set to reprimand Mandelson for… [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 2:50 pm
Donaldson, et al., Particle Toxicology, CRC, Taylor & Francis Group (2007); (ii) N.A. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 4:19 am
Denning and Molly C Taylor (Cumberland School of Law and Samford University - Cumberland School of Law) has posted Morse V. [read post]