Search for: "Taylor v. United States National Bank"
Results 101 - 109
of 109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
Dec. 31, 2008)(Unpub)Affirming dismissal of Burma native's national origin/failure-to-reclassify claim5th Circuit Taylor v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 8:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 16 June / 1 July:US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 & 103’ - San Francisco / New York: (Patent Docs), 17-20 June: US BIO international convention – San Diego: (Patent Docs), 18-20 June / 9-11 July: US PLI: ‘Fundamentals of patent prosecution 2008: A… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Smalley, No. 06-4552 A sentence for bank robbery is vacated and remanded for resentencing where: 1) the district court erred in applying a four-level enhancement for "otherwise us[ing]" a dangerous weapon during the course of a bank robbery, as opposed to a three-level enhancement for "brandish[ing] or possess[ing]" a dangerous weapon; and 2) the error was not harmless despite the district court's attempt to amend its judgment after the sentencing hearing… [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
This list was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:37 am
Keisler, No. 06-60644"Pakistani native's petition for review of a denial of his application for cancellation of removal from the United States is denied as misuse of a social security number in violation of 42 U.S.C. section 408(a)(7)(A) falls within the definition a crime involving moral turpitude, for purposes of ineligibility for a grant of cancellation of removal. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Gonzales
• Taylor v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 4:30 am
On Tuesday, December 5, the Court will hear argument in United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 9:41 am
United States, that numerous taxes were not "direct," and thus did not have to be apportioned by census. [read post]
