Search for: "Teamsters v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jun 2010, 9:20 am by Anna Christensen
United States (08-876) Argued: Dec. 8, 2009 Issue: Whether the “honest services” clause of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am by Peter Vickery
The source of the uncertainty is the recent decision in Noel Canning v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:34 am
” [Grievant] was entitled to, “...all the rights and privileges guaranteed by the laws of the State of Oklahoma and the Constitution of the United States of America. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
If a past practice involving a mandatory subject of negotiation is established the Taylor Law bars the employer from unilaterally discontinuing that practice Town of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:03 am by Joy Waltemath
The BFOQ positions served the paramount concern of security, as well as the legitimate prison objectives of inmate privacy and preventing sexual assaults (Teamsters Local Union No. 117 v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 3:36 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Some answers are set forth in   NADA, -against- 1199 SEIU HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES UNION, 09 Civ. 5796 (SAS);UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:37 pm
Untimeliness of arbitrator's award doesn't warrant vacating awardIn First Student, Inc v International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 959, the District Court for Alaska denied a request to vacate an award of Arbitrator Elizabeth Ford. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am by Eugene Volokh
It is therefore a "requirement that pseudonymity be limited to the 'unusual case.'" United States v. [read post]