Search for: "Teamsters v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 201
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 11:07 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977), for the notion that individual class members (after a stage I liability finding) are entitled to a presumption that that were discriminated and their individual damages can be heard in mini-trials per Teamsters. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:17 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
United States, 431 U.S. 324, (1977) -- “dooms the plaintiffs’ request for certification under Rule 23(b)(2). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
If a past practice involving a mandatory subject of negotiation is established the Taylor Law bars the employer from unilaterally discontinuing that practice Town of Islip v New York State Pub. [read post]
5 Feb 2013, 9:03 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
  Recess appointments are permitted in Article II, Section 2, clause 3 of the United States Constitution. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am by Peter Vickery
The source of the uncertainty is the recent decision in Noel Canning v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:54 am by Greg Mersol
And, most recently, the United States District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia  determined that President Obama’s recess appointments in January 2012 were illegal. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 11:30 am by Holland & Hart
Mumaugh The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia issued the long anticipated ruling in the Noel Canning v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:36 pm by Keith R. Fisher
NLRB, challenges an NLRB cease and desist order relating to a purported refusal to bargain, and is currently pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 7:49 pm by Kevin Funnell
To us, this assertion seems to fall far short of the standard of proof in a “pattern and practice” case decided by the Supreme Court in 1977 in Teamsters v. [read post]