Search for: "Test Plaintiff"
Results 101 - 120
of 21,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2016, 1:21 pm
Plaintiffs in a class-action lawsuit now seek to vacate thousands of convictions in which evidence was produced by those breath-testing machines. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:25 am
During the test drive, the vehicle collided with the plaintiff’s vehicle and the plaintiff sustained injuries. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 10:48 am
Those aspects of his research and conclusions plaintiffs take issue with do not warrant exclusion, but rather can be tested through cross-examination. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:38 am
The Court of Appeals agreed with Plaintiff that there was no material evidence to support the jury’s finding of $0 in damages, as the undisputed evidence established that Plaintiff was at least entitled to the costs of the diagnostic tests. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 7:28 am
Friend adopted the "nerve center" test for determining a corporation's principal place of business. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
The court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment of noninfringement of plaintiffs' vacuum cleaner design patents and rejected plaintiffs' argument that the ordinary observer test may be satisfied with a "quick glance" to determine "the same basic shape. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:50 am
Plaintiff Garcia was a taxicab driver for several years with Border Transportation Group (“BTG”). [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 8:52 am
However, since the test was only a preliminary one, it did not test for the active metabolite of THC. [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 11:16 am
Plaintiffs described him in the amended complaint as a “Boeing Senior Structural Analyst Engineer” who allegedly had worked on wing-stress tests of the 787-8 Dreamliner and who, as part of his job, supposedly had direct access to and first-hand knowledge of the results of the stress tests, as well as internal, contemporaneous communications regarding those tests. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:24 am
Plaintiffs—authors of copyright protected books—brought an action for infringement against Google, claiming that its digitization of millions of books without Plaintiffs’ permission violated copyright law. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 8:24 am
Plaintiffs—authors of copyright protected books—brought an action for infringement against Google, claiming that its digitization of millions of books without Plaintiffs’ permission violated copyright law. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:16 pm
These risks have been increased by relatively recent state and federal legislation that prohibits discrimination based on genetic characteristics, as well as the recent trend by plaintiffs' attorneys to consider class action claims instead of just challenging employment practices on behalf of their own individual clients. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 1:45 pm
As we explained in our friend-of-the-court brief, “Although the right to speak anonymously is not absolute, the constitutional protections it affords to speakers required the district court to pause and meaningfully consider the First Amendment implications of the discovery order sought by Plaintiffs, applying the correct test designed to balance the needs of plaintiffs and defendants in Doe cases such as this one. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:07 am
(Remember: the test for overturning a trial judge’s findings based on the credibility of witnesses is the “clear and convincing evidence” test.) [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 1:54 pm
Plaintiffs in a mutual fund class action have sought rehearing en banc after a ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit rejected the so-called Gartenberg test, which looks to the “reasonableness” of advisory fees charged by investment advisors. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 10:20 am
The principal plaintiff, East Coast Test Prep, provides test prep help for nurses. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
The plaintiffs hired Dr. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 1:18 pm
While the court concluded the plaintiff had not met the test for apportionment, the plaintiff’s success in that case on the issue of fault (although no damage was found and the action dismissed) was a relevant factor under Rule 37B(6)(d), now Rule 9-1(5)(b), on considering if the defendant was entitled to double costs when there had been a defence offer, which in Mudry obviously exceeded the damage award which was nil..… [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 4:49 am
Background The plaintiff received an offer of employment conditioned on her passing a mandatory drug test. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:17 pm
Philip Henry delivers his opening statement for the plaintiffs at trial against two doctors accused of negligence that led to a patient's cancer death. [read post]
