Search for: "Texas International Terminals, Ltd."
Results 101 - 111
of 111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Plaintiff eventually moved for summary judgment on its federal and state trade secret misappropriation claims, arguing that the defendant improperly took plaintiff’s confidential information, including bidding sheets, internal costs, manuals, and other techniques developed internally and exclusively for plaintiff’s own use. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
(IP finance), Microsoft and Nikon sign patent cross-licensing agreement covering consumer electronics: (Managing Intellectual Property), World day against software patents: (Spicy IP), (IPKat), Patents.com – PatentMonkey redux: (The Patent Librarian’s Notebook), Women and patents: it is not working at the moment: (IAM) Experts discuss the role of IP in environmental technology transfer: (Intellectual Propery Watch), WIPO’s 2008 World Patent Report: (The Patent… [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
(brackets in original; internal quotation marks omitted).To survive a motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), the factual allegations in the complaint `must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
John Elwood reviews the first relists of 2019. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
Excelsius Int'l, Ltd., 2007 U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
The draft directive is currently being reviewed by the EU Parliament’s Legal Affairs, Internal Market, and Industry Committees and their decisions have not been released yet. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Carlson was suspended and ultimately terminated. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Supreme Court Justices and Donors Mingle at Campus Visits. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
The appeals court thus reversed the district court’s contrary decision, holding that the EEOC was entitled to summary judgment as to its unlawful termination claim on behalf of the employee. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[24] Courts in Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia do not enforce Type II agreements and only enforce Type I agreements.[25] Other jurisdictions enforce both Type I and Type II agreements as binding. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:23 pm
But having once made the appointment, his power over the office is terminated in all cases, where, by law, the officer is not removable by him. [read post]
