Search for: "The Judicial Council of California "
Results 101 - 120
of 1,624
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2023, 6:09 pm
The new proposed language adopts verbatim the 1st District's Local Rule 15.SDCBA invites all interested parties to support its proposed amendment by sending in supporting letters to the Judicial Council, emailed to Legal-Services@jud.ca.gov or mailed to Judicial Council of California, Attention: Chief Counsel (Rule/Form Proposal), 455 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102-3688. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 5:07 pm
© Consumer Attorneys Of California FORUM July/August 2023 Click this link to access t [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:53 am
Associate Attorney, California Regional. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 12:58 pm
Circuit: We (mostly) reject the government's argument that it can do whatever it wants without judicial review. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
It was financed with at least $1.8 million from conservative nonprofit groups steered by the judicial activist Leonard Leo. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:22 am
“Whenever the court has discretion to determine the appropriate sentence according to relevant statutes and the sentencing rules of the Judicial Council, the court presiding over a criminal matter shall consider the disparate impact on historically disenfranchised and system-impacted populations. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In National Pork Producers Council Ross, a fractured Court upheld the constitutionality of a California law banning the in-state sale of meat from pigs confined under certain “cruel” conditions. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 8:48 am
The Judicial Council is required to adopt a rule of court to implement Section 21189.85 by the end of 2023. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm
In this annual roundup, we offer highlights of the commentary and insight that Stanford Law School faculty members provided on key SCOTUS decisions during this year’s term (beginning October 2022). [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 12:15 pm
” In early 2020, certain City Council members began exploring a possible City-sponsored ballot measure to remove the coastal height limit from the entire Midway-Pacific Highway Community Plan Area. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Atlantic Council’s DFRLab, #StopTheSteal: Timeline of Social Media and Extremist Activities Leading to 1/6 Insurrection, Just Security (Feb. 10, 2021) 2. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Warby LJ has been appointed as a Judicial Commissioner of the Judicial Appointments Commission, the independent body responsible for the selection of candidates for judicial office in tribunals and courts in England and Wales. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 8:52 am
In California v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:20 pm
California Indian Legal Services Housing Attorney. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
California – A Big Contract Went to a San Jose Private School Run by the Mayor’s Wife. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
On June 29, 2023 the Supreme Court held that colleges and universities making "admission decisions" that relied, in part, on racial considerations violated the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:16 pm
A few appellate tidbits from the Budget:For California’s judicial branch, the total budget of $5.2 billion includes a net increase of $426.9 million, with no cuts to court operational funding.Funding amounts: Supreme Court = 59.6M; Courts of Appeal = $283.7M; Trial Courts = $3,982M; Judicial Council = $360MAppellate Court Security= $1.4M from the Appellate Courts Trust Fund to support four additional CHP officers.Appellate Court Construction = $2.8M for a… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:15 pm
After numerous hearings before the City’s planning commission and council, receipt of extensive public input, and revision of the overlay ordinance to address that input, the City Council had voted unanimously to adopt the amended version of the ordinance (which continued to exclude Lucas’s property as an eligible cannabis business site); determined it was exempt from CEQA under Guidelines § 15183; and adopted the Findings of Consistency. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 10:26 am
" As discussed [see this post], the trial court erred in taking judicial notice of these facts. [read post]