Search for: "The People v. Chambers"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2010, 2:56 am
The Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) is (and has been since June 1, 2009), the appellate body for, inter alia, the LVT and the RPTS. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:15 pm
Some very hard work -- over a period of years, most likely -- by a bevy of personnel in chambers. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 4:21 pm
It's an impressive work product given the rapid deadlines the Ninth Circuit placed itself under.That said, my educated guess that this particular opinion was given more than the typical amount of attention and priority in chambers, no? [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 3:45 pm
People make mistakes and judges are people too…In Wang v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:27 am
Detroit Public Schools, Case No. 138168; granted the State leave to file an overlength merits brief in People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 12:32 pm
A reality that I suspect would have been different had Judge Smith's chambers to have been the one to write the original bench memo.All speculation on my part, of course. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
Oscar Davies, a barrister at Lamb Chambers, and Jack Castle, a barrister at Henderson Chambers, offer their views on the Elan-Cane decision (R (On the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2021] UKSC 56) in this piece that first appeared in the New Law Journal. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
… Warman et al. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 11:19 am
The lead case is Chambers v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Chambers. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 6:06 am
Their position was analogous to that of the claimant in Burnip v Birmingham City Council, who herself required overnight care. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 10:48 am
While social media can create echo chambers, it can also expose people to ideas they wouldn’t otherwise encounter. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 11:59 am
Latest decisions of the First-tier Tribunal, General Regulatory Chamber [Information Rights] Michael Cole v IC EA/2010/0071. [read post]
24 Mar 2021, 7:59 am
v=Ui3z7-1rUYI&t=1s "For those people sometimes cannot be understood well by others but still have strong willingness to be understood. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:37 am
In January 2011, the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights held in Mouvement Raëlien Suisse v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 4:37 am
In January 2011, the First Section of the European Court of Human Rights held in Mouvement Raëlien Suisse v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 2:19 pm
In Arc Mercer, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 6:20 am
Supreme Court ruled, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
We reconvened in line at 8:45 and they initially allowed the first 50 people to enter the chamber. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:15 pm
Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the NLRA preemption case of Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
