Search for: "Thomas v. Department of Corrections" Results 101 - 120 of 733
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2014, 5:06 am
Appellant presented claimed that Department of Corrections violated his First Amendment rights by denying him information regarding the method of his execution. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am by Kirk Jenkins
 Counsel said that was correct; a conviction was the triggering event which provided the Department of Professional Regulation with the authority to revoke the license. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:25 pm
And Judges Noonan and Thomas agree.Apart from the merits, I guess the "new" Las Vegas is somewhat like the old Las Vegas. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm by Will Baude
Departing from the doctrine of stare decisis is an "exceptional action" demanding "special justification. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 10:00 am by Howard Friedman
Department of Correctional Services, 2011 U.S. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:13 am by Charlotte Butash
” McGahn’s Supplemental Brief In response, McGahn, represented by Justice Department lawyers, argues that the panel decision was correct because Article III bars judicial resolution of interbranch suits. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm
The court held that Appellant's grievance was properly directed to the head of the State Department of Corrections, as it was a retaliation claim, and that the district court had not explained how Appellant had failed to state his claims. 8. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Berger
  Likewise, Justices Thomas and Alito dissented from Scalia's opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 7:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Thomas filed a separate dissenting opinion in which Justice Alito joined (Encino Motorcars, LLC v. [read post]