Search for: "U. S. v. Burns"
Results 101 - 120
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
The logic of today's 303 Creative LLC v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
Standard of review from Minister of Health is correctness Pfizer Canada v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
"[U]sing this ‘guilt by association' inference in their methodology is of questionable scientific reliability. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
” Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in cross-examination. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 10:48 am
Louis Gossett Jr. is a U. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 3:30 am
” In Bennett v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:56 pm
Most of Russell’s paper concentrates on Simkins’ career at UT, as well as the 1954 decision (five weeks after Brown v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:53 am
Village of Skokie, 432 U.S. 43 (1977)) and the flag-burning cases (Texas v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:36 am
Mississippi, 162 U. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:12 pm
., has rejected Sierra Club’s attempt to stop the Department of Energy from providing money or a loan guarantee on a 582-MW coal-fired power plant in Mississippi, until it has fully examined environmental impacts (Sierra Club v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
” Citing Capital Newspapers Div. of Hearst Corp. v Burns, 109 AD2d 92, affd 67 NY2d 562, the Appellate Division said that the legislative history of §50-a indicates that the "statute was intended to apply to situations where a party to an underlying criminal or civil action is seeking documents in a police officer's personnel file, and was apparently designed to prevent 'fishing expeditions' to find material to use in … [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:10 pm
There are, to be sure, instances where action conveys a symbolic meaning—such as the burning of a flag to convey disagreement with a country’s policies, see Texas v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:17 pm
By the logic of the Supreme Court’s reigning Second Amendment case, District of Columbia v. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:52 am
Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 405–06 (1989) (recognizing flag burning as a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment); Snyder, 562 U.S. 443, 454–56 (2011) (recognizing a religious sect’s right to picket military funerals). [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:20 am
S. 1, 17–18 (1966); see also KSR International v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:04 pm
Mary’s University; Mary-Jo Mustoe (R. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Tarick Loufti v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 1:15 pm
What we do know is that CBP is the nation’s largest law enforcement agency, with money and resources to burn. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 6:38 am
ACLU, 521 U. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 8:46 pm
Bush’s use of military commissions to try suspected members of al-Qaeda in Hamdan v. [read post]
