Search for: "U. S. v. Dept. of Insurance"
Results 101 - 120
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2008, 10:10 am
Co. (2nd Dept., decided 10/23/2007), the Second Department ruled that since an insured lacks a business duty, as opposed to a contractual duty, to report to his or her insurer in the course of its investigation regarding insurance coverage, neither the insured's statement nor testimony regarding such a statement is admissible pursuant to the business records exception to the hearsay rule. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:42 am
Case in point: Harker v Guyther, 2014 NY Slip Op 07403 [3d Dept Oct. 30, 2014], decided last month by the Appellate Division, Third Department, in which the court resorted to dictionary definitions of the term “misappropriation” in denying summary judgment to a 50% LLC member who sought to expel the other 50% member in a fight ostensibly over health insurance coverage, of all things. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:48 pm
May Dept. [read post]
15 May 2013, 6:55 am
Court of Appeals Paternity - Defense of Equitable Estoppel - Applied to Deny Non-Biological Father Right to Deny Paternity In Commissioner of Social Services on Behalf of Elizabeth S. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:19 pm
Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs., 199 AD2d 393, 394; see Domestic Relations Law § 240 [1-b][b][5][iv][D]). [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Lancer Insurance Co., 7 Misc 3d 1002(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 51860(U) (Civil Ct., Kings Co. 2004). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am
On November 14, 2014, in Priests for Life v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:23 am
In Cosmetics Plus Group, Ltd. v Traub ;2011 NY Slip Op 32149(U); August 4, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County ;Docket Number: 113240/09; Judge: Judith J. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:00 am
Kohler lacked capacity when she executed her advanced directives (Matter of Goldfein v Kohler, 221 AD3d 500 [1st Dept 2023]). [read post]
31 May 2020, 8:37 am
” State, Office of Attorney Gen., Dept. of Legal Affairs v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
Reed v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:05 am
However, as the Court ruled in Vasquez v Wood (18 AD3d 645, 646 [2d Dept Z O O S l ) , the Hotel Defendants have not been convicted of a crime, and there have been no cases which broaden the applicability of this provision as the First Department has broadened CPLR 215 (8) in Alford. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 10:07 am
(Coverage by: No Fault Paradise; Edwards Angle Palmer & Dodge).Trentacoste v Riverhead Central School District, 2009 NY Slip Op 31112(U) (Sup. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 4:28 am
(Church v Callanan Indus, 99 NY2d 104; Fried v Signe Nielsen Landscape Architect, PC, 34 Misc 3d 1212[A], 2012 NY Slip Op 50062[U]). [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am
A few months ago, we wrote about precisely such a case, Rosin v Schnitzler, 2018 NY Slip Op 32320(U) [Sup Ct, Kings County Sept. 4, 2018], in which Commercial Division Justice Lawrence S. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:15 am
City of Schenectady, 256 AD 389 (3d Dept 1939), and Jewett v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 3:50 am
Co., 34 AD3d 364 [1st Dept 2006]; see also Ring v AXA Fin., Inc., 2008 NY Slip Op 30637[U], *8 [Sup Ct, NY County 2008] [applying continuing violations doctrine to General Business Law § 349 claim where initial payments occurred outside statute of limitations but “the insurer . [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 4:30 am
Co., 2020 NY Slip Op 08050 [2d Dept Dec. 30, 2020]). [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 4:26 am
in Flaherty v Attie ;2009 NY Slip Op 51296(U) ; Supreme Court, Queens County ; Markey, J. we see what happens. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
Citing the familiar case of Leff v. [read post]
