Search for: "U. S. v. Goode" Results 101 - 120 of 2,755
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
” Although the test’s threshold is viewed as relatively low, not all cases justify removal, and where the state opposes removal and offers persuasive reasons for why Mesa is not satisfied, the burden is very much on the removing party to provide specific reasons as to why the test is met.[6] The Mesa test remains good law and applies to all removals under section 1442.[7] “Although the statute is ‘liberally construed’… the Supreme Court has… [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  In May 2012, he delivered "A Prudent Regard to Our Own Good? [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
She previously authored The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program and Hansberry v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
The writing is super approachable, so it’s a pretty good piece for students. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 6:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Walsam 316, LLC v Thompson & Knight LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 32693(U) August 2, 2023Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 156653/2022 Judge: Dakota D. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm by Howard Knopf
Ariel and I, along with a very smart young law professor named David Lametti, who later became Minister of Justice, made the prevailing arguments in the SCC in the 2015 case of Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Eric Goldman
A reminder that FOSTA’s constitutionality (as narrowed) doesn’t make FOSTA a good law. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Jordan Steinberg
While some companies have made the argument successfully that they had no knowledge of a partner’s intentions to transport their goods to New York (Ortiz v Food Mach. of Am., Inc.) (2014 NY Slip Op. 31868[U] [Bronx Ct. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Ronald M. Levin
Justice Kavanaugh’s policy arguments borrowed heavily from Heckler v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by ilyabeylin
  The opinion cites Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters v. [read post]