Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2008, 10:01 pm
Quoting CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 8:32 am
If the respondent had not attacked others and had dealt with the mark as a label mark, claiming no exclusive right to the letters A, Y, U & R perhaps this mark would not have been challenged. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:23 am
B&B Hardware, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 12:56 pm
Ariel Katz speaks at about the 22 minute mark. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 4:52 pm
SCOTUS Decision The Brunetti case follows an earlier decision, Matal v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 8:50 am
Speakers include Harvard Law Professor Jonathan Zittrain; former Library Innovation law director Adam Ziegler; Ravel Law cofounders Nik Reed and Daniel Lewis; Free Law Project founder Mike Lissner; Legal Information Institute executive director Sara Frug; Angela Jaffee, account director at vLex and former national programs administrator for the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; Carl Malamud, founder of Public.Resource.Org; Harvard Law Professor Alexandra Natapoff; and Chief Justice… [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 10:09 pm
S. ___, ___ (2021) (per curiam) (slip op., at 6) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:46 pm
A black mark on one’s U-5 can make it extremely difficult, and in some cases, impossible, to find another job in the industry. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 5:46 pm
U L Canada Inc. and TGI Friday’s of Minnesota, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:19 am
This post is based on a Gibson Dunn alert by Mark A. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 7:45 am
Dan McKenna, Practice Group Leader of Ballard Spahr’s Consumer Financial Services Litigation Group, hosts the conversation, joined by Mark Furletti, Co-Chair of the firm’s Consumer Financial Services Group, and three partners in the firm’s Consumer Financial Services Litigation Group: Stefanie Jackman, Jenny Perkins, and Joel Tasca. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:07 am
Kevin explains as follows:Did Amazon’s search results infringe MTM’s trade mark? [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 11:41 am
Introduction With its decision in Adolph v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:32 pm
When-U, 414 F.3d 400 (2d Cir. 2005), Merck & Co., v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:43 am
Similarity of Marks: The marks in the counterfeit games are identical to Sega’s trademark.c. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:41 am
Madison (1803) to Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 6:12 am
Hills, P.C. v Holguin 2021 NY Slip Op 50032(U) [70 Misc 3d 135(A)] Decided on January 15, 2021 Appellate Term, Second Department remain true. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:45 am
Supreme Court’s decisions in Matal v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:41 am
S. 452 (1997) and Bowles v. [read post]
