Search for: "U. S. v. Marks"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,451
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2023, 8:51 am
(See Bommarito v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:23 pm
S. 465 (1895); and Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm
In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
Ante, at 20, 22 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
23 May 2023, 2:37 pm
By Chris Holman Much has been already been written about the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Amgen v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 9:22 am
S. 183, 187 (2006) (per curiam) (remanding to agency based on failure by Court of Appeals to "appl[y] the ordinary remand rule" (internal quotation marks omitted)); INS v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:07 am
With today's decisions, Justices Jackson, Kagan, and Gorsuch have tied Justice Kavanaugh's mark of three opinions for the Court this term. [read post]
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am
Plaintiff’s accident occurred on August 9, 2017 and the notice of claim was marked as received on November 8, 2017-ninety-one days from the date of plaintiff’s incident. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
The claimants argue that the delay in filing the claims resulted from the newspaper’s concealment of its staff’s behaviour. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
Tarbert (1987) and Com. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:53 am
Kupferman’s decision in Celia v Celia (2023 NY Slip Op 30995(U) [Sup Ct, Saratoga County Mar. 31, 2013]). [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
Australia’s highest court emphatically rejected the relevance of reputation in either the allegedly infringing or infringed mark is relevant to the assessment of deceptive similarity, ruling that PROTOX and “instant BOTOX alternative” do not infringe the registered trade mark BOTOX. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
With Congress’s help, our headcount this year now is approximately three percent larger than in 2016. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 6:37 am
Ulanov, 2020 IL App (1st) 182501-U For example, in Ulanov v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
The issuer’s decision to execute a buyback program constitutes transaction-specific inside information in its possession. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 6:13 pm
S. 452, 464 (2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 12:42 pm
S. 692, 739–742 (2004) (Scalia, J., concurring in part and concurring in judgment); Jesner v. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
Reich, 510 U. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 5:09 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
