Search for: "U. S. v. Taylor*#"
Results 101 - 120
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 5:17 am
" According to the original and superseding indictments filed in Manhattan federal court: The original indictment, United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 9:25 am
In NTP, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
”) (emphasis added); Taylor v. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:04 am
”) (emphasis added); Taylor v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 4:43 am
Taylor, 529 U. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
U. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Taylor, 487 U. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:58 am
The district argued that PERB had exclusive jurisdiction over such issues.The Commissioner ruled that his disposition of the appeal considered matters unrelated to the Taylor Law and thus his dismissal of Fusco’s appeal and deferral to PERB was not required.In addition, the district asked the Commissioner for permission to submit two additional documents it claimed addressed substantive issues related to Fusco’s conduct after it had filed its answer to… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
But we know that’s simply not true. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
SPBA’s petition set out two causes of action: 1. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
Thanks to Brian U. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 28 February 2022, the claimant’s case was dismissed in Taylor v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 149. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:01 pm
Taylor, 106 S.W.3d 692, 694 n.3 (Tex. 2003). [read post]
