Search for: "U.S. District Court for Northern District of California"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,615
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2023, 5:20 am
District Court for the Northern District of California, filed a preliminary injunction blocking the enactment of the California Age-Appropriate Design Code Act. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:15 am
District Court for the District of Northern California, for allegedly stealing private information from millions of internet users. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 4:15 am
District Court for the District of Northern California, for allegedly stealing private information from millions of internet users. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:55 am
The Supreme Court returns to the bench for a new term today, in which it will consider curbs to federal agencies’ power, as well as gun rights and congressional districts. [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 8:43 am
District Court for the Northern District of California certified a class of flight attendants based in California … Continue reading "California District Court Grants Class Certification In Wage Statement Action" [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 3:15 pm
Office of the General Counsel – U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
District Court for the Northern District of California—this time a preliminary injunction granted against California’s Age Appropriate Design Code (AADC)—it is worth asking what this means for the federally proposed Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA) and other laws of similar import that have been considered in a few states. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
After the Supreme Court granted certiorari in 2016, it divided 4-4, thereby establishing no precedent but leaving the Fifth Circuit’s decision in place. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
On Tuesday, "[a]fter carefully considering the briefing and conducting oral argument on August 3, 2023," Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Qualcomm's motion for summary judgment in its entirety: In Re: Qualcomm Antitrust Litigation (case no. 17-md-02773-JSC, N.D. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 2:57 am
OTHER DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS The U.S. military captured Abu Halil al-Fad’ani, an official of the self-styled Islamic State militant group, in a helicopter raid in northern Syria on Saturday, U.S. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 12:11 pm
U.S. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California granted a nationwide injunction barring EOIR from implementing an earlier rule limiting the discretion of immigration judges and the Board of Immigration Appeals in managing their caseloads. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:38 pm
Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California just denied in part--and in economic terms, almost completely--a U.S. antitrust class action brought on behalf of leading French publishers such as Le Figaro and L'Équipe (about that one, see my personal note toward the end). [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:57 am
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 6:30 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:23-cv-04557 (September 5, 2023). [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 2:35 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Indiana detailed the Supreme Court’s precedents on anonymous speech: In Talley v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California will hold a trial starting November 6. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
The way that these types of concerns about the banking industry can translate into securities litigation, even in the absence of a bank failure, is illustrated in the lawsuit filed on August 4, 2023, in the Northern District of Ohio, against KeyCorp, the bank holding company for KeyBank, and certain of its executives. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 8:35 am
She has authored briefs submitted to the Board of Immigration Appeals, as well as to the federal district courts, circuit courts of appeal, and U.S. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
At the stage of removal, as noted below, the district court is not considering whether the test under the Supremacy Clause has been satisfied. [read post]
