Search for: "U.S. v. Carr*"
Results 101 - 120
of 12,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 (1958)). [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 6:37 pm
U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
In 1962, in Robinson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Perry, 558 U.S. 183, 190 (2010) (per curiam); cf. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
For U.S. persons (U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents) to be “agents of a foreign power,” their activity generally must implicate U.S. criminal laws. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 9:40 am
The U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:05 am
TBL Licensing v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:38 am
Bad Spaniels case, the U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
If it undermines official efforts of the U.S. to isolate Syria for a Democratic member of Congress to meet with Bashar Assad, then a meeting with a Repubican member of Congress has the same effect. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:34 pm
U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
Dickerson, 508 U.S. 366, 375 (1993). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The U.S. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
But shortly thereafter, the U.S. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 1:45 pm
1.SCOTUS will hear Fischer v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:29 pm
In State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
As a reminder for those familiar, the acts that trigger an excise tax include: (i) taxes on the private foundation’s net investment income,[15] (ii) prohibitions on self-dealing transactions,[16] (iii) failure to make the required five percent (5%) qualifying distributions to charities,[17] (iv) prohibition on excess business holdings,[18] (v) prohibition on holding jeopardizing investments,[19] and (vi) taxable expenditures,[20] none of which apply to a 501(c)(4).[21] Despite the… [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 11:44 am
The petition, known as Stone v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
" The platforms challenged the law on First Amendment grounds in NetChoice v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 2:56 pm
Proc. 97-35, and cases like RJR Nabisco, Inc. v. [read post]
