Search for: "U.S. v. Pleasant*"
Results 101 - 120
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Nov 2024, 9:28 am
Susan V. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 2:35 pm
U.S. (06-11206) — failure to report to jail as “violent felony” under federal armed career criminal law U.S. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972) or the three-part due process analysis set forth in Mathews v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 5:33 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 8:22 am
A divided U.S. [read post]
13 May 2007, 8:49 am
" U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:14 pm
Others in the legal community disagree with this – they argue for a more permissive approach to AI ownership in the U.S., as argued in this amicus brief from Thaler v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:01 am
Communications Workers of America, 475 U.S. 643, 650 (1986)). [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:01 am
Communications Workers of America, 475 U.S. 643, 650 (1986)). [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 5:41 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 3:01 pm
Interestingly, though, Nitze clerked for Justice Sotomayor during the 2012 Supreme Court term, when the court decided U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:14 pm
Others in the legal community disagree with this – they argue for a more permissive approach to AI ownership in the U.S., as argued in this amicus brief from Thaler v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:54 am
Hannaman, 168 U.S. 328, 333-34 [1897]), unless the “partnership has for its object the completion of a specified piece of work, or the effecting of a specified result” (Hardin v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 11:48 am
Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 (1938). [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:38 am
In Walker v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Bauman, ___ U.S. ___, 134 S. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:23 am
@coolasmcqueen U.S. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
Photo from website of U.S. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
Madden v Midland Funding, LLC, 786 F.3d 246 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136, S. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court recently granted review in Walker v. [read post]
