Search for: "U.S. v. Ramadan" Results 101 - 120 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2016, 11:01 am by Howard Friedman
The court recommended dismissal of his complaint regarding occasional denial of food to break the fast during Ramadan, and his claim that denial of call outs was in retaliation for not complying with the prison grooming policy.In Holland v. [read post]
15 May 2016, 7:41 pm by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 60454 (D Z, May 5, 2016), an Arizona federal district court permitted a Muslim inmate to proceed with his complaint that he was not permitted to grow his beard longer than one-quarter inch, and that the feeding time for Ramadan began too late.In Phillips v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 10:13 am by Howard Friedman
The court allowed plaintiff to move ahead with his complaint that on 10 occasions during Ramadan he was not permitted to take a shower or engage in ritual cleansing before group prayer.In Hogue v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 11:00 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 37100 (ND NY, March 21, 2016), a New York federal magistrate judge told defendants to wait until the completion of discovery to move for summary judgment in a case in which Muslim inmates complained that they could not attend daily Ramadan services or consult with an imam during a lock down and that they received inappropriate Ramadan food.In Smith v. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 9:49 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 32333 (WD PA, March 14, 2016), a Pennsylvania federal magistrate judge dismissed an inmate's rambling, incoherent complaint regarding restrictions on Muslim inmates' right to attend the two feasts of the Ramadan holiday.In Green v. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 8:29 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 176470, Dec. 22, 2015) and dismissed claims by an inmate who was removed from the Ramadan list and Muslim services for a period of time after he argued over religious theology with other inmates.In Dawson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 6:30 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 168188 (SD NY, Dec. 16, 2015), a New York federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint under the free exercise clause that the nutritional inadequacy of the Ramadan meals, combined with the inability to supplement the meals with food from the commissary, forced him to switch from the Ramadan diet.In Johnson v. [read post]