Search for: "U.S. v. Shelby" Results 101 - 120 of 355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2013, 7:49 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
The report comes as the Court is considering Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:57 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425, 440, 6 S.Ct. 1121, 1124, 30 L.Ed. 178 (1886). [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 2:42 am by Amy Howe
City of Shelby, a case in which the plaintiffs had not specifically invoked 42 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Rehnquist Center Director Sally Rider Marcus argued that Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Rehnquist Center Director Sally Rider Marcus argued that Shelby County v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
  That decision was left intact by the Justices in the case of Shelby County v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 5:41 am by Rachel Sachs
At Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen links to the briefs filed by seven states and by former Department of Justice Officials as amici in Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 1:23 am
Shelby Realty LLC KINGS COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawTenants Raise Factual Allegations Sufficient to Defeat Judgment Based on Business Judgment Rule Imani Housing HDFC v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:31 pm by Guest Blogger
It seems to me that the important distinction is that what is in the constitutional canon will be hard to change, and the Roberts Court majority has shown in Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 12:21 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil PracticeCourt Denies Stay of Its Judgment Dismissing Government's Claim to Forfeiture of $1.4 MillionUnited States v. $1,399,313.74 in U.S. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Like other factual findings in the trial court, the Supreme Court defers to these findings as to predominant motive.Finally, the fact that relevant portions of the Voting Rights Act on which the Arizona districting commission relied have since been held unconstitutional in Shelby County v. [read post]