Search for: "US Appraisers, Inc."
Results 101 - 120
of 799
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2021, 5:54 am
Background It has long been accepted that Delaware courts use the same valuation methodologies to determine fair value in a judicial appraisal and fair price in a fiduciary duty action. [1] There is no real debate that, “in general, the techniques used to determine the fairness of price in a non-appraisal stockholder’s suit are the same as those used in appraisal proceedings. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 11:09 am
The coverage dispute arose out of underlying claims relating to the 2015 merger of Alliant Techsystems, Inc and Orbital Sciences Corporation to form Orbital ATK, Inc. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:58 am
Related research from the Program on Corporate Governance includes Using the Deal Price for Determining “Fair Value” in Appraisal Proceedings (discussed on the Forum here) and Appraisal After Dell, both by Guhan Subramanian. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 1:54 pm
Therefore, Autoniq sent a cease and desist letter to Laser Appraiser for its alleged use of the Autoniq Mark. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 3:24 pm
Co., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 12:05 pm
MUSIC ROYALTY CONSULTING, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:18 pm
Rule 506(b) prohibits the use of “general advertising or general solicitation. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 1:08 pm
” The agreement did not define the term “appraised market value” or elaborate on the methodology to be used by a third party in performing the valuation. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 10:58 am
See The Race, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 10:58 am
See The Race, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 10:58 am
See The Race, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 5:44 am
Laser Appraiser, LLC Court Case Number: 1:20-cv-02433-RLY-MJDFile Date: September 21, 2020Plaintiff: Adesa, Inc., Autoniq, LLCPlaintiff Counsel: Louis T. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:04 pm
Goya Foods Inc., No. 2:19-cv-19003 (D.N.J. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 10:02 am
Almost a decade later, it rendered its decision in Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm
In BMW of North America, Inc v Gore (517 US 559 (1996)), she dissented from another decision reviewing an allegedly excessive punitive-damages award and argued that the Court should ‘resist unnecessary intrusion into an area dominantly of state concern. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 9:03 am
AB 2257 clarifies that the business service provider may use proprietary materials of the contracting agency that are necessary to perform the services of the contract. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 3:44 am
Several years later Chain requested that the other shareholders agree to an appraisal of the property for purposes of buying out her shares for “fair compensation. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
LANDMARK CONSTRUCTION INC. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm
Background On AB 5 AB 5, as of January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
Here, stockholder William Richard Kruse (“Kruse”) sought appraisal of his shares of SynapseWireless, Inc. [read post]
