Search for: "US v. Andrew Grant"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2023, 4:21 pm
Elster, No. 22-704, petition for review granted 6/5/2023, by Laura Little and Andrew Rosen. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
Given the stature of both Meadows and Giuliani, and their apparent level of culpability in relation to the events described in this pros memo, however, we also think it unlikely that the special counsel would grant them any kind of immunity without concomitantly requiring a plea agreement. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm
Andrew Restuccia and Ted Mann, “Jan. 6, 2021: How It Unfolded - A Minute-by-Minute Look,” Wall Street Journal (Feb. 12, 2021) 5. [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 2:55 am
Although the Court of Appeal was clear, in Neurim v Generics [2020] EWCA Civ 793, that deciding to uphold the lower court’s decision not to grant a pharmaceutical patent PI was based on the specific facts of that case, the Patents Court has subsequently refused two further pharmaceutical PIs (Neurim v Teva [2022] EWHC 954 (Pat) and [2022] EWHC 1641(Pat), and Novartis v Teva [2022] EWHC 959 (Ch)). [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
Held, the conviction appeal was dismissed but leave to appeal the sentence was granted. [read post]
2 Jul 2023, 1:37 am
With significantly more patents currently being opted-out than granted per week, this indicates that many patent owners are still reviewing their European portfolios to opt-out patents that granted before the UPC opened. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 4:41 am
Andrew Free writes: "Judge Anita Brody of the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania issued an order denying CBP’s motion for summary judgment on search adequacy, and granting in part Plaintiff Karen Hoffmann’s motion for summary judgment as to search adequacy. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
It's based on amicus briefs that Michael Dorf (Cornell), Andrew Koppelman (Northwestern), and I filed in past cases (and that I blogged about before), but it elaborates somewhat further on that argument. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 3:54 pm
From Warren v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 4:01 am
Here is the complaint: Johnson v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
Little and Andrew Rosen. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
Grant Steen, and Arturo Casadevall, “Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications,” 109 Proc. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
That's the title of a new piece that Markus Funk,* Andrew S. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:51 am
” District Judge Andrew P. [read post]
29 May 2023, 11:43 am
These provisions, placed today in Chapter V of the UPCA, include the definition of the patent’s owner prerogatives to prevent the direct and indirect use of the invention (Art. 25 and 26), the list of limitations concerning the scope of patent protection, including inter alia, acts done privately or for experimental purposes, the use of biological material for the purpose of breeding, discovering and developing other plant varieties (Art. 27), the condition of the… [read post]
26 May 2023, 5:50 am
The Judge granted the application.. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am
" In Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:32 am
In Hoffman-La Roche v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The defamation claim was brought by Andrew Bridgen MP against former health minister, Matt Hancock MP. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
