Search for: "US v. Barber" Results 101 - 120 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 6:00 am by Susan Brenner
The Court of Appeals also noted that in Barber v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 6:11 pm
Barber and attorneys Joyner and McSurely, and shared the above passages with them for comment. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 10:02 am
Wade Should Have Said (2005)Sotirios Barber and James E. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
The homelessness cases were never going to succeed because there was CA authority in the way (Barber and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield DC [2009] EWCA Civ 285). [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:41 am by Dave
The homelessness cases were never going to succeed because there was CA authority in the way (Barber and McGlynn v Welwyn Hatfield DC [2009] EWCA Civ 285). [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:34 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Barbers brush it on customers after using a razor or electric clippers without a guard to prevent minor skin irritation. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:00 pm
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state – provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Esbeck, The Establishment Clause: What the Text and Record in the First Federal Congress Can Tell Us About Original Meaning, (University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2020-19 (2020)).Beatrice Jessie Hill, Reconsidering Hostile Takeover of Religious Organizations, (Washington University Law Review (forthcoming 2020)).Ian Huyett, How to Overturn Employment Division v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:25 am by Steven Eversole
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state - provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am by Dave
  The HHJ uses Eastlands Homes v Whyte [2010] EWHC 695 (QB), at [65], as the basis for this outcome. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am by Dave
  The HHJ uses Eastlands Homes v Whyte [2010] EWHC 695 (QB), at [65], as the basis for this outcome. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 7:28 am by Michael Scutt
  What would have been the situation had Barber been using his employer’s computer to access Facebook, or the offending comments had been placed upon a corporate Facebook page, or twitter account or blog? [read post]