Search for: "US v. Boss" Results 101 - 120 of 1,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2024, 3:46 pm by Söğüt Atilla
Trade MarksJocelyn Bosse reported on the long-awaited decision of the UK Supreme Court in SkyKick UK Ltd v Sky Ltd. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 6:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 8:13 am by royblack
There are moments and events in our lives that transform us. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers.
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical state of the… [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 1:41 pm by M. McClure
On December 7th, 2010, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thompson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 1:07 pm by Robertson Branigan
It always amazes us the things employers tell their employees. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 1:59 am by Sophie Corke
So without further ado, let's take a look at recent commentary and developments.Trade MarksThe Trademark Lawyer and The Fashion Law reported here and here on British comedian Joe Lycett's name change to Hugo Boss, in order to protest what he sees as overly heavy-handed trade mark assertion by fashion company Hugo Boss against small businesses.The Fashion Law also offered context and comment on the “Stopping Harmful Offers on Platforms by… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
On December 5th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a Fourth Amendment case, Messerschmidt v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:29 am
The use of this feed on other websites breaches copyright. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:48 pm
Margarita López Torres, an aspiring candidate, argued in the US District Court for the Eastern District of New York that certain elements of the convention system used in that state violate the First Amendment Rights of both the voting public and herself by concentrating an unfairly prodigious amount of power in the hands of political bosses. [read post]