Search for: "US v. David Green" Results 101 - 120 of 779
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2010, 2:20 am by gmlevine
Lacking right or legitimate interest in the disputed domain name and, according to the majority in David Green, “linking [it] to adult-oriented websites is a widely accepted evidence of use in bad faith. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Charon QC
Cameron would never flick a V sign at the people of Britain) And on this momentous day for Egypt… Lord Sugar tweets away…. you..really…could not make it up… I haven’t even got the will to use Lord Sugar’s catchphrase in a post mubarka-ironic way…. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 8:06 am by Anita Davies
David Cameron defended government plans, saying the government needed to take every step to keep the country safe. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm by Amy Howe
Commentary on the four-four tie in United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 9:25 am by Eric Goldman
[Note: tomorrow I’m on a panel about Section 230 with David Greene (EFF) and Cathy Gellis. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 4:51 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Today, David Oxenford highlights how Stephen Colbert does a good job explaining the trademark law surrounding the Olympic Games. [read post]
14 May 2018, 10:35 am by Karen Gullo
“Speaker-based and viewpoint-based discrimination of speech in a designated public forum like the university’s Facebook page is rarely permitted under the First Amendment,” said EFF Civil Liberties Director David Greene. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 6:33 am
On November 17, 2006, an affiliate of Leonard Green & Partners signed an agreement with Macy's to acquire David's Bridal and consummated the sale and transfer of stock of David's Bridal to the Leonard Green affiliate on January 31, 2007. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
Never Too Late 183 [week ending 18 February] Mr Justice Carr's L'Oreal v RN Ventures decision bristles with warnings on Actavis v Lilly claim interpretation, equivalents and prosecution history (Parts I and II) | Can Wenzhou and cigarette lighters tell us something about why there are IP rights? [read post]