Search for: "US v. David Rich" Results 101 - 120 of 441
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Supreme Court began building out sexual harassment law from a Title VII case in 1986, Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:38 am by David Frakt
 -- David Frakt Highest Performers but Lowest Pass Rate, there is Something Seriously Wrong in California By: Mitchel L. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
Third, the list makes us think why it is, exactly, we do what we do. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
This case relates to Regen's patent, claiming a method for the preparation of platelet rich plasma. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:03 am by Eugene Volokh
The IJ people gave an answer there, and IJ's David Hodges has kindly written it up for me to post: In September, Linda Greenhouse of the New York Timesnoted something "odd" about Espinoza v. [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Each year, scholars at the Mackinac Center for Public Policy, a Michigan think tank, use a statistical analysis of available data to estimate smuggling rates for each state.[1] Their most recent report uses 2017 data and finds that smuggling rates generally rise in states after they adopt cigarette tax increases. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
” Jon Riches writes at Real Clear Politics that “[i]n deciding Kisor v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:02 pm by Hannah Diaz
Please join us in congratulating this year's trivia masterminds:1st Place: F.U.C.T. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  In some ways, I am simply asking whether the use of the term “translation” really adds much, if anything, to the more standard term “interpretation. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
  But I do think it is useful to at least think with such a model, and reflect on its possible dynamics. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:35 pm by Joe Mullin
We’ve written many times about small businesses that were saved because the patents being used to sue them were thrown out under Section 101, especially following the Supreme Court’s Alice v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
Balkin, Democracy and Dysfunction (University of Chicago Press, 2019).David Pozen’s post suggests that what I call “the Constitution of settlement” is in fact potentially less truly “settled” than it may seem to be. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Watkins, “holding that religious tests may not be used to decide who holds public office” Engel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media In the case of UFC-Que Choisir v Google (Judgment in French) the TGI Paris has ruled that 38 of the clauses in Google’s “Terms of use” and “Confidentiality Policy” were unfair and hence null and void. [read post]