Search for: "US v. Edward Davis"
Results 101 - 120
of 234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2007, 9:51 am
Edwards v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 2:29 pm
Davis v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:07 pm
Edwards of Edwards Law Office, P.C., Etna, WyomingRepresenting Appellee (Plaintiff/Defendant): Audrey P. [read post]
13 Mar 2013, 12:15 am
V. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
Based on its thematic approach, law teachers in general will benefit from using this book, as the themes apply across many areas of substantive law teaching.Details: Publisher: Edward ElgarAvailable in hardback, paperback and ebook (incl. for library purchase) Extent: 362ISBN: 978 1 80088 099 3 [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm
Under Edwards v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 9:43 am
Edwards, the court said that alleging a violation of a federal statute was sufficient to satisfy Article III standing. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:53 am
Koshenina v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
"Simmons v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 11:31 am
The First District Court of Appeal in Jeansonne v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 1:15 pm
Professor Davis profiled a similar Order No. 1000 challenge—incidentally, also captioned LSP Transmission Holdings II v. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:35 pm
Michigan and Davis v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
Lawanda Davis - Appellant, Dr. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 3:37 pm
In Davis, the challenge is the use of the Stored Communications Act 18 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Davi, LLC, 2:21-CV-00273-MCE-DB, 2022 WL 256867, at *5 (E.D. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am
Edward J. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am
Edward J. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 1:16 pm
Moreover, the plantiffs in Kitzmiller discovered that after the Supreme Court ruling in Edwards, Percival and Davis replaced the term "creationists" with "design proponents" throughout the book. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:12 am
Dec 09, 2008) (NO. 4054, 5263/05)Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward J. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
Considers the plans for an experimental period of use in the US federal courts, and notes that there has been no empirical effects research in the UK. [read post]
